Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Diagnostic utility of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP in elderly outpatients with a high risk of heart failure: the Copenhagen heart failure risk study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{051243fcf9764d43bb2120ddd33ede07,
title = "Diagnostic utility of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP in elderly outpatients with a high risk of heart failure: the Copenhagen heart failure risk study",
abstract = "Background: Amino-terminal-pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (NT-proBNP) is a diagnostic biomarker for heart failure (HF), but plasma concentrations are influenced by numerous factors. Mid-regional-pro-atrial-natriuretic-peptide (MR-proANP) have comparable diagnostic value in acute HF. However, data are lacking in the non-acute setting. This study sought to assess the diagnostic utility of MR-proANP in outpatients with a high risk of HF.Methods: This prospective study included 399 outpatients. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 60 years, ≥1 risk factor for HF (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension), without known or suspected HF. Unrecognized HF was diagnosed based on clinical signs, patient-reported symptoms and echocardiography. Plasma concentrations of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were analysed.Results: In total, 65 patients were diagnosed with HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (N = 12 LVEF ≤ 40{\%}, N = 7 LVEF > 40{\%} to ≤50{\%}, N = 46 LVEF > 50{\%}). Both MR-proANP (odds-ratio: 1.77; 95{\%} CI:1.16-2.72; p = 0.009) and NT-proBNP (odds-ratio: 1.49; 95{\%} CI:1.22-1.82; p < 0.001) were associated with HF. Area under receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) for the diagnosis of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction was higher for MR-proANP (AUC = 0.886; p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.910; p < 0.001) compared to patient-reported symptoms of HF (AUC = 0.830), but NT-proBNP added more diagnostic information compared to MR-proANP (p = 0.022).Conclusions: Both NT-proBNP and MR-proANP are useful biomarkers in the diagnosis of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a non-acute setting. However, NT-proBNP added more diagnostic information compared to MR-proANP.",
keywords = "biomarkers, diagnostic value, heart failure, MR-proANP, Natriuretic peptides, NT-proBNP",
author = "Gaborit, {Freja Stoltze} and Caroline Kistorp and Thomas K{\"u}mler and Christian Hassager and Niels T{\o}nder and Kasper Iversen and Hansen, {Pernille M{\o}rk} and Kamstrup, {Pia R{\o}rbaek} and Jens Faber and Lars K{\o}ber and Morten Schou",
year = "2020",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/1354750X.2020.1732466",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "248--259",
journal = "Biomarkers",
issn = "1354-750X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic utility of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP in elderly outpatients with a high risk of heart failure

T2 - the Copenhagen heart failure risk study

AU - Gaborit, Freja Stoltze

AU - Kistorp, Caroline

AU - Kümler, Thomas

AU - Hassager, Christian

AU - Tønder, Niels

AU - Iversen, Kasper

AU - Hansen, Pernille Mørk

AU - Kamstrup, Pia Rørbaek

AU - Faber, Jens

AU - Køber, Lars

AU - Schou, Morten

PY - 2020/5

Y1 - 2020/5

N2 - Background: Amino-terminal-pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (NT-proBNP) is a diagnostic biomarker for heart failure (HF), but plasma concentrations are influenced by numerous factors. Mid-regional-pro-atrial-natriuretic-peptide (MR-proANP) have comparable diagnostic value in acute HF. However, data are lacking in the non-acute setting. This study sought to assess the diagnostic utility of MR-proANP in outpatients with a high risk of HF.Methods: This prospective study included 399 outpatients. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 60 years, ≥1 risk factor for HF (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension), without known or suspected HF. Unrecognized HF was diagnosed based on clinical signs, patient-reported symptoms and echocardiography. Plasma concentrations of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were analysed.Results: In total, 65 patients were diagnosed with HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (N = 12 LVEF ≤ 40%, N = 7 LVEF > 40% to ≤50%, N = 46 LVEF > 50%). Both MR-proANP (odds-ratio: 1.77; 95% CI:1.16-2.72; p = 0.009) and NT-proBNP (odds-ratio: 1.49; 95% CI:1.22-1.82; p < 0.001) were associated with HF. Area under receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) for the diagnosis of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction was higher for MR-proANP (AUC = 0.886; p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.910; p < 0.001) compared to patient-reported symptoms of HF (AUC = 0.830), but NT-proBNP added more diagnostic information compared to MR-proANP (p = 0.022).Conclusions: Both NT-proBNP and MR-proANP are useful biomarkers in the diagnosis of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a non-acute setting. However, NT-proBNP added more diagnostic information compared to MR-proANP.

AB - Background: Amino-terminal-pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (NT-proBNP) is a diagnostic biomarker for heart failure (HF), but plasma concentrations are influenced by numerous factors. Mid-regional-pro-atrial-natriuretic-peptide (MR-proANP) have comparable diagnostic value in acute HF. However, data are lacking in the non-acute setting. This study sought to assess the diagnostic utility of MR-proANP in outpatients with a high risk of HF.Methods: This prospective study included 399 outpatients. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 60 years, ≥1 risk factor for HF (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension), without known or suspected HF. Unrecognized HF was diagnosed based on clinical signs, patient-reported symptoms and echocardiography. Plasma concentrations of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were analysed.Results: In total, 65 patients were diagnosed with HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (N = 12 LVEF ≤ 40%, N = 7 LVEF > 40% to ≤50%, N = 46 LVEF > 50%). Both MR-proANP (odds-ratio: 1.77; 95% CI:1.16-2.72; p = 0.009) and NT-proBNP (odds-ratio: 1.49; 95% CI:1.22-1.82; p < 0.001) were associated with HF. Area under receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) for the diagnosis of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction was higher for MR-proANP (AUC = 0.886; p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.910; p < 0.001) compared to patient-reported symptoms of HF (AUC = 0.830), but NT-proBNP added more diagnostic information compared to MR-proANP (p = 0.022).Conclusions: Both NT-proBNP and MR-proANP are useful biomarkers in the diagnosis of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a non-acute setting. However, NT-proBNP added more diagnostic information compared to MR-proANP.

KW - biomarkers

KW - diagnostic value

KW - heart failure

KW - MR-proANP

KW - Natriuretic peptides

KW - NT-proBNP

U2 - 10.1080/1354750X.2020.1732466

DO - 10.1080/1354750X.2020.1732466

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 248

EP - 259

JO - Biomarkers

JF - Biomarkers

SN - 1354-750X

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 59580394