TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of Betalactam-Predictor
T2 - A Clinical Decision Tool for Delabeling Low-Risk Betalactam Allergy Patients. Initial Validation in Penicillin Allergy
AU - Labella, Marina
AU - Nuñez, Rafael
AU - Doña, Inmaculada
AU - de Guzmán, Julia Rodríguez
AU - Moreno, Esther
AU - Garvey, Lene Heise
AU - Laguna, Jose Julio
AU - Barbaud, Annick
AU - Bonnadona, Patrizia
AU - Boel, Jonas Bredtoft
AU - Mosbech, Holger
AU - Sfriso, Giovanna
AU - Castells, Mariana
AU - Phillips, Elizabeth
AU - Torres, María José
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Background: A label of betalactam (BL) allergy is estimated in around 10% of the population in their medical records. Second-line choices carry significant negative consequences, including reduced efficacy, effectiveness, and safety. This study aimed to develop a new highly specific score constructed by selecting variables assisted by artificial intelligence to identify low-risk BL-allergic patients. Methods: In this study, derivation and validation of the BL-predictor score were performed on a retrospective cohort of 2207 patients who underwent penicillin allergy testing at Málaga University Hospital (Spain). The development of the BL-predictor encompassed expert drafting and a two-step variable selection process consisting of univariate analysis and variable filtering, followed by stepwise logistic regression with resampling. To assess the efficiency, a multicentric retrospective external validation was performed in 4261 patients from six populations: Salamanca and Madrid, Spain; Nashville, United States of America; Verona, Italy; Paris, France; and Copenhagen, Denmark. Results: The definitive questionnaire consisted of eight items and risk points were computed from the logistic regression model as follows: +1 for reactions after first dose or in less than 1 h (ITEM-1), +2 for anaphylaxis (ITEM-2); +1 for previous reaction with the culprit (ITEM-3); −1 for resolution in > 24 h (ITEM-4); +2 for spontaneous resolution (ITEM-5); −2 for unknown symptoms (ITEM-6); −2 for reaction occurred > 5 years (ITEM-7), and −1 for another reported drug allergy (ITEM-8). After establishing a threshold of ≤ 0 points to classify individuals with low risk, internal validation showed a specificity of 86% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%. Overall multicenter external validation showed a specificity of 93%, which implies a 25% increase in specificity compared to the previously published BL decision tool. Conclusion: This score would simplify diagnostic procedures in low-risk patients, enabling rapid delabeling, potentially in non-specialty settings, and reducing diagnostic costs and the negative consequences associated with incorrect antibiotic allergy labels.
AB - Background: A label of betalactam (BL) allergy is estimated in around 10% of the population in their medical records. Second-line choices carry significant negative consequences, including reduced efficacy, effectiveness, and safety. This study aimed to develop a new highly specific score constructed by selecting variables assisted by artificial intelligence to identify low-risk BL-allergic patients. Methods: In this study, derivation and validation of the BL-predictor score were performed on a retrospective cohort of 2207 patients who underwent penicillin allergy testing at Málaga University Hospital (Spain). The development of the BL-predictor encompassed expert drafting and a two-step variable selection process consisting of univariate analysis and variable filtering, followed by stepwise logistic regression with resampling. To assess the efficiency, a multicentric retrospective external validation was performed in 4261 patients from six populations: Salamanca and Madrid, Spain; Nashville, United States of America; Verona, Italy; Paris, France; and Copenhagen, Denmark. Results: The definitive questionnaire consisted of eight items and risk points were computed from the logistic regression model as follows: +1 for reactions after first dose or in less than 1 h (ITEM-1), +2 for anaphylaxis (ITEM-2); +1 for previous reaction with the culprit (ITEM-3); −1 for resolution in > 24 h (ITEM-4); +2 for spontaneous resolution (ITEM-5); −2 for unknown symptoms (ITEM-6); −2 for reaction occurred > 5 years (ITEM-7), and −1 for another reported drug allergy (ITEM-8). After establishing a threshold of ≤ 0 points to classify individuals with low risk, internal validation showed a specificity of 86% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%. Overall multicenter external validation showed a specificity of 93%, which implies a 25% increase in specificity compared to the previously published BL decision tool. Conclusion: This score would simplify diagnostic procedures in low-risk patients, enabling rapid delabeling, potentially in non-specialty settings, and reducing diagnostic costs and the negative consequences associated with incorrect antibiotic allergy labels.
KW - anaphylaxis
KW - challenge tests
KW - drug allergy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105027820344
U2 - 10.1111/all.70222
DO - 10.1111/all.70222
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41549873
AN - SCOPUS:105027820344
SN - 0105-4538
JO - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
ER -