TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of the Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale
AU - Cold, Kristoffer Mazanti
AU - Heen, Amihai
AU - Vamadevan, Anishan
AU - Vilmann, Andreas Slot
AU - Konge, Lars
AU - Rasmussen, Morten
AU - Søndergaard Svendsen, Morten Bo
N1 - Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Insufficient bowel preparation accounts for up to 42% of missed adenomas in colonoscopy. However, major analysis programs found no correlation between adenoma detection rate and the human-rated Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), indicating limitations of the scale. We therefore aimed to develop an Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale (OSABPS) based on artificial intelligence that is correlated to the polyp detection rate.METHODS: The OSABPS was trained on 50,000 frames from 20 colonoscopies from 3 hospitals. It involved quantifying the presence of fecal matter within the colonoscopy frames, using an approach termed the fecal ratio-the proportion of pixels identified as feces (F) relative to those identified as mucosal tissue (M) (OSABPS = F/M)-thereby making 0 the optimal score, indicating a perfect cleansing. The Youden J was used to set the threshold because it determines the optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity. The algorithm was then tested on 1405 colonoscopies from 3 hospitals (internal validation) and 5525 frames from a public colonoscopy database (Nerthus, external validation).RESULTS: Internal validation: the OSABPS correlated significantly with the BBPS (Pearson r = -0.42, P < .001). A threshold of 0.09 OSABPS was determined using the Youden J. The polyp detection rate was higher for colonoscopies below the threshold of the Youden J (2-proportion z-test, P < .001). External validation: the OSABPS correlated significantly with the BBPS (Pearson r = -0.70, P < .001).CONCLUSIONS: The OSABPS can automatically, instantly, and without human bias assess bowel preparation quality. Colonoscopies with an OSABPS of >0.09 should be considered for reexamination. The OSABPS's open-source nature allows free implementation.
AB - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Insufficient bowel preparation accounts for up to 42% of missed adenomas in colonoscopy. However, major analysis programs found no correlation between adenoma detection rate and the human-rated Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), indicating limitations of the scale. We therefore aimed to develop an Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale (OSABPS) based on artificial intelligence that is correlated to the polyp detection rate.METHODS: The OSABPS was trained on 50,000 frames from 20 colonoscopies from 3 hospitals. It involved quantifying the presence of fecal matter within the colonoscopy frames, using an approach termed the fecal ratio-the proportion of pixels identified as feces (F) relative to those identified as mucosal tissue (M) (OSABPS = F/M)-thereby making 0 the optimal score, indicating a perfect cleansing. The Youden J was used to set the threshold because it determines the optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity. The algorithm was then tested on 1405 colonoscopies from 3 hospitals (internal validation) and 5525 frames from a public colonoscopy database (Nerthus, external validation).RESULTS: Internal validation: the OSABPS correlated significantly with the BBPS (Pearson r = -0.42, P < .001). A threshold of 0.09 OSABPS was determined using the Youden J. The polyp detection rate was higher for colonoscopies below the threshold of the Youden J (2-proportion z-test, P < .001). External validation: the OSABPS correlated significantly with the BBPS (Pearson r = -0.70, P < .001).CONCLUSIONS: The OSABPS can automatically, instantly, and without human bias assess bowel preparation quality. Colonoscopies with an OSABPS of >0.09 should be considered for reexamination. The OSABPS's open-source nature allows free implementation.
KW - Adenoma/diagnosis
KW - Aged
KW - Algorithms
KW - Artificial Intelligence
KW - Cathartics/administration & dosage
KW - Colonic Polyps/diagnosis
KW - Colonoscopy/methods
KW - Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
KW - Feces
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214291589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.022
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.022
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39557204
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 101
SP - 1201
EP - 1210
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 6
ER -