Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Determining minimal important change for the thyroid-related quality of life questionnaire ThyPRO

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Cholecystokinin and the hormone concept

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Free testosterone and cardiometabolic parameters in men: comparison of algorithms

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Plasma levels of glucagon but not GLP-1 are elevated in response to inflammation in humans

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. The economic impact of prevention, monitoring and treatment strategies for iodine deficiency disorders in Germany

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Objective: ThyPRO is the standard thyroid patient-reported outcome (PRO). The change in scores that patients perceive as important remains to be ascertained. The purpose of this study was to determine values for minimal important change (MIC) for ThyPRO.

Methods: A total of 435 patients treated for benign thyroid diseases completed ThyPRO at baseline and 6 weeks following treatment initiation. At 6 weeks follow-up, patients also completed Global Rating of Change items. For each 0-100 scale, two MIC values were identified: An MIC for groups, using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method and an MIC for individual patients, using the Reliable Change Index.

Results: ROC analyses provided group-MIC estimates of 6.3-14.3 (score range 0-100). Evaluation of area under the curve (AUC) supported the robustness for 9 of 14 scales (AUC > 0.7). Reliable Change Index estimates of individual-MIC were 8.0-21.1. For all scales but two, the individual-MIC values were larger than the group-MIC values.

Conclusions: Interpretability of ThyPRO was improved by the establishment of MIC values, which was 6.3-14.3 for groups and 8.0-21.1 for individuals. Thus, estimates of which changes are clinically relevant, are now available for future studies. We recommend using MIC values found by ROC analyses to evaluate changes in groups of patients, whereas MIC values identified by a dual criterion, including the reliability of changes, should be used for individual patients, for example, to identify individual responders in clinical studies or practice.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEndocrine Connections
Vol/bind10
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)316-324
Antal sider9
ISSN2049-3614
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2021

ID: 65611055