Den landsdækkende undersøgelse af patientoplevelser har tvivlsom kvalitet

Merete Watt Boolsen; Lise Munk Plum; Jens G Hillingsø

Den landsdækkende undersøgelse af patientoplevelser har tvivlsom kvalitet

Merete Watt Boolsen, Lise Munk Plum, Jens G Hillingsø

3 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

We question the social science methodology in survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences (LUP). The results from the survey are part of the accreditation system in The Danish Health-care Quality Programme (DDKM). The methodological validity is researched through LUP-publications. We find that LUP has doubtful scientific quality which means that the validity of the survey results as such is questionable. Since this has consequences for the practical, economic, political and health-care decisions, we recommend that the total accreditation programme should be reconsidered.

Bidragets oversatte titel	The quality of the survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences is questionable.
Originalsprog	Dansk
Tidsskrift	Ugeskrift for Laeger
Vol/bind	175
Udgave nummer	35
Sider (fra-til)	1954-1957
Antal sider	4
ISSN	0041-5782
Status	Udgivet - 26 aug. 2013

Citationsformater

@article{bb6147d847364d71933feaad84f537c3,

title = "Den landsd{\ae}kkende unders{\o}gelse af patientoplevelser har tvivlsom kvalitet",

abstract = "We question the social science methodology in survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences (LUP). The results from the survey are part of the accreditation system in The Danish Health-care Quality Programme (DDKM). The methodological validity is researched through LUP-publications. We find that LUP has doubtful scientific quality which means that the validity of the survey results as such is questionable. Since this has consequences for the practical, economic, political and health-care decisions, we recommend that the total accreditation programme should be reconsidered.",

author = "Boolsen, {Merete Watt} and Plum, {Lise Munk} and Hillings{\o}, {Jens G}",

year = "2013",

month = aug,

day = "26",

language = "Dansk",

volume = "175",

pages = "1954--1957",

journal = "Ugeskrift for Laeger",

issn = "0041-5782",

publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",

number = "35",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Den landsdækkende undersøgelse af patientoplevelser har tvivlsom kvalitet

AU - Boolsen, Merete Watt

AU - Plum, Lise Munk

AU - Hillingsø, Jens G

PY - 2013/8/26

Y1 - 2013/8/26

N2 - We question the social science methodology in survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences (LUP). The results from the survey are part of the accreditation system in The Danish Health-care Quality Programme (DDKM). The methodological validity is researched through LUP-publications. We find that LUP has doubtful scientific quality which means that the validity of the survey results as such is questionable. Since this has consequences for the practical, economic, political and health-care decisions, we recommend that the total accreditation programme should be reconsidered.

AB - We question the social science methodology in survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences (LUP). The results from the survey are part of the accreditation system in The Danish Health-care Quality Programme (DDKM). The methodological validity is researched through LUP-publications. We find that LUP has doubtful scientific quality which means that the validity of the survey results as such is questionable. Since this has consequences for the practical, economic, political and health-care decisions, we recommend that the total accreditation programme should be reconsidered.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

C2 - 23978118

SN - 0041-5782

VL - 175

SP - 1954

EP - 1957

JO - Ugeskrift for Laeger

JF - Ugeskrift for Laeger

IS - 35

ER -

Den landsdækkende undersøgelse af patientoplevelser har tvivlsom kvalitet

Abstract

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater