Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Delirium assessment in neuro-critically ill patients: A validation study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Long-term Survival and Cognitive Function According to Blood Pressure Management During Cardiac Surgery. A Follow-up

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The PANSAID Randomized Clinical Trial: A pre-planned 1-year follow-up regarding harm

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Maintaining Competence in Airway Management

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Pharmacological sex hormone manipulation as a risk model for depression

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Self-rated worry is associated with hospital admission in out-of-hours telephone triage - a prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Hypozincaemia is associated with severity of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Delirium is underinvestigated in the neuro-critically ill, although the harmful effect of delirium is well established in patients in medical and surgical intensive care units (ICU).To detect delirium, a valid tool is needed. We hypothesized that delirium screening would be feasible in patients with acute brain injury and we aimed to validate and compare the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist against clinical International Classification of Diseases-10 criteria as reference.

METHODS: Nurses assessed delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist in adult patients with acute brain injury admitted to the Neurointensive care unit (Neuro-ICU), Copenhagen University Hospital, if their Richmond agitation-sedation scale score was -2 or above. As the reference, a team of psychiatrist assessed patients using the International Classification of Diseases-10 criteria.

RESULTS: We enrolled 74 patients, of whom 25 (34%) were deemed unable to assess by the psychiatrists, leaving 49 (66%) for final analysis. Sensitivity and specificity for the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU was 59% (95% CI: 41-75) and 56% (95% CI: 32-78), respectively, and 85% (95% CI: 70-94) and 75% (95% CI: 51-92), respectively, for the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist may be a valid tool and the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU is less suitable for delirium detection for patients in the Neuro-ICU. In the neuro-critically ill, delirium screening is challenged by limited feasibility.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind63
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)352-359
Antal sider8
ISSN0001-5172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2019

ID: 56235373