Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Deep inspiration breath hold in locally advanced lung cancer radiotherapy: validation of intrafractional geometric uncertainties in the INHALE trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Feasibility of a novel liquid fiducial marker for use in image guided radiotherapy of oesophageal cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Evaluation of uterine ultrasound imaging in cervical radiotherapy; a comparison of autoscan and conventional probe

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Reproducibility of (18)F-FDG PET uptake measurements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on both PET/CT and PET/MR

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. The risk of late effects following pediatric and adult radiotherapy regimens in Hodgkin lymphoma

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Prevalence of cognitive impairment and its relation to mental health in Danish lymphoma survivors

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVES: Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were included in a prospective trial for radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH). We evaluated DIBH compliance and target position reproducibility.

METHODS: Voluntary, visually guided DIBHs were performed with optical tracking. Patients underwent three consecutive DIBH CT scans for radiotherapy planning. We evaluated the intrafractional uncertainties in the position of the peripheral tumour, lymph nodes and differential motion between them, enabling PTV margins calculation. Patients who underwent all DIBH imaging and had tumour position reproducibility <8 mm were up-front DIBH compliant. Patients who performed DIBHs throughout the treatment course were overall DIBH compliant. Clinical parameters and DIBH-related uncertainties were validated against our earlier pilot study.

RESULTS: 69 of 88 included patients received definitive radiotherapy. 60/69 patients (87%) were up-front DIBH compliant. DIBH plan was not superior in seven patients and three lost DIBH ability during the treatment, leaving 50/69 patients (72%) overall DIBH compliant.The systematic and random errors between consecutive DIBHs were small but differed from the pilot study findings. This led to slightly different PTV margins between the two studies.

CONCLUSIONS: DIBH compliance and reproducibility was high. Still, this validation study highlighted the necessity of designing PTV margins in larger, representative patient cohorts.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We demonstrated high DIBH compliance in locally advanced NSCLC patients. DIBH does not eliminate but mitigates the target position uncertainty, which needs to be accounted for in treatment margins. Margin design should be based on data from larger representative patient groups.

TidsskriftThe British journal of radiology
Udgave nummer1104
Sider (fra-til)20190569
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2019

ID: 58931018