Data concerning the Copenhagen tool: A research tool for evaluation of basic life Support educational interventions

Theo Walther Jensen; Andrew Lockey; Gavin D Perkins; Anders Granholm; Kristine E Eberhard; Asbjørn Hasselager; Thea Palsgaard Møller; Annette Kjær Ersbøll; Fredrik Folke; Anne Lippert; Doris Østergaard; Anthony J Handley; Douglas Chamberlain; Freddy Lippert

doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.106679

Data concerning the Copenhagen tool: A research tool for evaluation of basic life Support educational interventions

Theo Walther Jensen, Andrew Lockey, Gavin D Perkins, Anders Granholm, Kristine E Eberhard, Asbjørn Hasselager, Thea Palsgaard Møller, Annette Kjær Ersbøll, Fredrik Folke, Anne Lippert, Doris Østergaard, Anthony J Handley, Douglas Chamberlain, Freddy Lippert

1 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

The data presented in this article are supplementary data related to the research article entitled "The Copenhagen Tool: A research tool for evaluation of BLS educational interventions" (Jensen et al., 2019). We present the following supplementary materials and data: 1) a standardized scenario used to introduce the test for gathering data on internal structure and additional response process; 2) test sheets used for rating test participant via video recordings; 3) interview-guide for collecting additional response process data; 4) items deemed relevant but not essential for laypersons, first responders and health personnel in the modified Delphi consensus process; 5) inter-rater reliability values for raters using the essential items of the tool to evaluate test participants via video recordings; 6) main themes from coding interviews with raters; 7) comparison of rater results and manikin software output.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	106679
Tidsskrift	Data in Brief
Vol/bind	34
Sider (fra-til)	106679
ISSN	2352-3409
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106679
Status	Udgivet - feb. 2021

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1016/j.dib.2020.106679

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

Jensen, T. W., Lockey, A., Perkins, G. D., Granholm, A., Eberhard, K. E., Hasselager, A., Møller, T. P., Ersbøll, A. K., Folke, F., Lippert, A., Østergaard, D., Handley, A. J., Chamberlain, D., & Lippert, F. (2021). Data concerning the Copenhagen tool: A research tool for evaluation of basic life Support educational interventions. Data in Brief, 34, 106679. Artikel 106679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106679

Jensen, TW, Lockey, A, Perkins, GD, Granholm, A, Eberhard, KE, Hasselager, A, Møller, TP, Ersbøll, AK, Folke, F , Lippert, A , Østergaard, D, Handley, AJ, Chamberlain, D & Lippert, F 2021, 'Data concerning the Copenhagen tool: A research tool for evaluation of basic life Support educational interventions', Data in Brief, bind 34, 106679, s. 106679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106679

@article{f4427706bc144d48b30a224b37eff8a6,

title = "Data concerning the Copenhagen tool: A research tool for evaluation of basic life Support educational interventions",

abstract = "The data presented in this article are supplementary data related to the research article entitled {"}The Copenhagen Tool: A research tool for evaluation of BLS educational interventions{"} (Jensen et al., 2019). We present the following supplementary materials and data: 1) a standardized scenario used to introduce the test for gathering data on internal structure and additional response process; 2) test sheets used for rating test participant via video recordings; 3) interview-guide for collecting additional response process data; 4) items deemed relevant but not essential for laypersons, first responders and health personnel in the modified Delphi consensus process; 5) inter-rater reliability values for raters using the essential items of the tool to evaluate test participants via video recordings; 6) main themes from coding interviews with raters; 7) comparison of rater results and manikin software output.",

keywords = "BLS, Education, Intervention, Resuscitation, Validation",

author = "Jensen, {Theo Walther} and Andrew Lockey and Perkins, {Gavin D} and Anders Granholm and Eberhard, {Kristine E} and Asbj{\o}rn Hasselager and M{\o}ller, {Thea Palsgaard} and Ersb{\o}ll, {Annette Kj{\ae}r} and Fredrik Folke and Anne Lippert and Doris {\O}stergaard and Handley, {Anthony J} and Douglas Chamberlain and Freddy Lippert",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors.",

year = "2021",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.dib.2020.106679",

language = "English",

volume = "34",

pages = "106679",

journal = "Data in Brief",

issn = "2352-3409",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data concerning the Copenhagen tool

T2 - A research tool for evaluation of basic life Support educational interventions

AU - Jensen, Theo Walther

AU - Lockey, Andrew

AU - Perkins, Gavin D

AU - Granholm, Anders

AU - Eberhard, Kristine E

AU - Hasselager, Asbjørn

AU - Møller, Thea Palsgaard

AU - Ersbøll, Annette Kjær

AU - Folke, Fredrik

AU - Lippert, Anne

AU - Østergaard, Doris

AU - Handley, Anthony J

AU - Chamberlain, Douglas

AU - Lippert, Freddy

PY - 2021/2

Y1 - 2021/2

N2 - The data presented in this article are supplementary data related to the research article entitled "The Copenhagen Tool: A research tool for evaluation of BLS educational interventions" (Jensen et al., 2019). We present the following supplementary materials and data: 1) a standardized scenario used to introduce the test for gathering data on internal structure and additional response process; 2) test sheets used for rating test participant via video recordings; 3) interview-guide for collecting additional response process data; 4) items deemed relevant but not essential for laypersons, first responders and health personnel in the modified Delphi consensus process; 5) inter-rater reliability values for raters using the essential items of the tool to evaluate test participants via video recordings; 6) main themes from coding interviews with raters; 7) comparison of rater results and manikin software output.

AB - The data presented in this article are supplementary data related to the research article entitled "The Copenhagen Tool: A research tool for evaluation of BLS educational interventions" (Jensen et al., 2019). We present the following supplementary materials and data: 1) a standardized scenario used to introduce the test for gathering data on internal structure and additional response process; 2) test sheets used for rating test participant via video recordings; 3) interview-guide for collecting additional response process data; 4) items deemed relevant but not essential for laypersons, first responders and health personnel in the modified Delphi consensus process; 5) inter-rater reliability values for raters using the essential items of the tool to evaluate test participants via video recordings; 6) main themes from coding interviews with raters; 7) comparison of rater results and manikin software output.

KW - BLS

KW - Education

KW - Intervention

KW - Resuscitation

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099219217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106679

DO - 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106679

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33490323

SN - 2352-3409

VL - 34

SP - 106679

JO - Data in Brief

JF - Data in Brief

M1 - 106679

ER -

Data concerning the Copenhagen tool: A research tool for evaluation of basic life Support educational interventions

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater