Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Correction to: Methods of data collection in psychopathology: the role of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Methods of data collection in psychopathology: the role of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Own-world and Common World in Schizophrenia: Towards a Theory of Anthropological Proportions

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. What can self-disorders in schizophrenia tell us about the nature of subjectivity? A psychopathological investigation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. What can self-disorders in schizophrenia tell us about the nature of subjectivity?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. On incomprehensibility in schizophrenia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Methods of data collection in psychopathology: the role of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Thinking Through the Schizophrenia Spectrum: Nosological Scenarios and Perspectives beyond Psychosis

    Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportBogpeer review

  3. A cookbook recipe for the clinical and phenomenologically informed, semi-structured diagnostic interview

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

  4. Differential Diagnosis: Schizophrenia and Personality Disorder

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

The original version of this article unfortunately contained missing Abstract. The missing Abstract should be 

Research in psychopathology is booming in an unprecedented way, at least, in terms of increasing number of publications. Yet, a few questions arise: Does quantity also give us quality? Are the collected data generally of sound quality? How are data typically collected in psychopathology? Are the applied methods of data collection appropriate for this particular field of study? This article explores three different methods of data collection in psychopathology, namely self-rating scales, structured interviews, and semi-structured, phenomenological interviews. To identify the most adequate methodological approach, we first establish the nature of the object of psychopathology and then we critically assess each method’s appropriateness to this field of study. We emphasize fundamental issues that make self-rating scales and structured interviews unfit for the task of adequately examining psychopathology. By contrast, we propose that a semi-structured, phenomenological interview presents a more appropriate method. Finally, we describe two types of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews that can be applied to assess and explore psychopathology, respectively. The original article has been corrected.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPhenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Vol/bind21
Sider (fra-til)31–32
Antal sider2
ISSN1568-7759
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2022

ID: 68819072