Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Conversion of standard retrospective patient-reported outcomes to momentary versions: cognitive interviewing reveals varying degrees of momentary compatibility

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Association between Type D personality and outcomes in patients with non-ischemic heart failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Strategies to improve patient-reported outcome completion rates in longitudinal studies

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Eculizumab improves fatigue in refractory generalized myasthenia gravis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. The effect of nature exposure on the mental health of patients: a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Measuring HRQoL following heart valve surgery: the HeartQoL questionnaire is a valid and reliable core heart disease instrument

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to adapt different domains of an existing retrospective questionnaire to momentary versions, to use and assess cognitive interviewing for evaluating the new versions, and to compare momentary compatibility (i.e. an item's potential to be validly converted to a momentary version) across different scales.

METHODS: Initial momentary versions of retrospective patient-reported outcomes were produced by converting present perfect tense wording to present tense wording. Cognitive interviews were conducted iteratively with 21 patients to determine which reference period they actually employed, and to identify problems with new, revised versions. A think-aloud interview protocol was supplemented with non-specific concurrent and specific retrospective probing. The momentary compatibility of each item was evaluated by calculating the proportion of interviews wherein momentary reference periods were identified; problems were categorized according to cognitive aspects of survey methodology taxonomy. The efficiency of various cognitive interviewing techniques was determined by evaluating whether applied reference periods were identified by think-aloud alone or by supplementary probes.

RESULTS: The momentary compatibility varied from 5 to 100% across items. Cognitive interviews revealed potential problems of various severities in the majority of items. Think-aloud alone was sufficient at determining the applied reference period in one-third of the cases, and the efficiency of additional concurrent and retrospective probing was 50 and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive interviewing techniques proved useful for developing and evaluating momentary items. Researchers should be aware of the applied reference period and of emerging problems when evaluating adapted momentary items, since not all concepts are suitable. We recommend the proposed method in future adaptations of existing instruments.

TidsskriftQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1065-1076
StatusUdgivet - 2018

ID: 52398555