TY - JOUR
T1 - Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock
AU - Helgestad, Ole Kristian Lerche
AU - Josiassen, Jakob
AU - Hassager, Christian
AU - Jensen, Lisette Okkels
AU - Holmvang, Lene
AU - Udesen, Nanna Louise Junker
AU - Schmidt, Henrik
AU - Berg Ravn, Hanne
AU - Moller, Jacob Eifer
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Objectives: To describe the contemporary trends in the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS). To evaluate survival benefit with early application of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella CP.Methods: A cohort study of all consecutive patients with AMICS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) <24 hours of symptom onset (early PCI) in southeastern Denmark from 2010 to 2017. A matched case-control study comparing 30-day mortality between patients receiving early-IABP or early-Impella CP and their respective control group. Controls were matched on age, left ventricular ejection fraction, arterial lactate, estimated glomerular filtration rate and cardiac arrest before PCI. Early-IABP/Impella CP was defined as applied before PCI if shock developed pre-PCI, or immediately after PCI if shock developed during PCI.Results: 903 patients with AMICS undergoing early PCI were identified. Use of MCS decreased from 50% in 2010 to 25% in 2017, p for trend of <0.001. The IABP was abandoned in 2012 and replaced mostly by Impella CP. Patients receiving MCS in 2013-2017 had more compromised haemodynamics compared with patients receiving MCS in 2010-2012. 40 patients received early IABP, and 40 patients received early Impella CP. Only the group receiving early Impella CP was associated with lower 30-day mortality compared with their matched control group (30-day mortality 40% vs 77.5%, plog-rank of<0.001).Conclusion: Use of MCS decreased by 50% from 2010 to 2017. Patients receiving MCS had more compromised haemodynamics in recent years. Early application of Impella CP was associated with reduced 30-day mortality compared with a matched control group.
AB - Objectives: To describe the contemporary trends in the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS). To evaluate survival benefit with early application of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella CP.Methods: A cohort study of all consecutive patients with AMICS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) <24 hours of symptom onset (early PCI) in southeastern Denmark from 2010 to 2017. A matched case-control study comparing 30-day mortality between patients receiving early-IABP or early-Impella CP and their respective control group. Controls were matched on age, left ventricular ejection fraction, arterial lactate, estimated glomerular filtration rate and cardiac arrest before PCI. Early-IABP/Impella CP was defined as applied before PCI if shock developed pre-PCI, or immediately after PCI if shock developed during PCI.Results: 903 patients with AMICS undergoing early PCI were identified. Use of MCS decreased from 50% in 2010 to 25% in 2017, p for trend of <0.001. The IABP was abandoned in 2012 and replaced mostly by Impella CP. Patients receiving MCS in 2013-2017 had more compromised haemodynamics compared with patients receiving MCS in 2010-2012. 40 patients received early IABP, and 40 patients received early Impella CP. Only the group receiving early Impella CP was associated with lower 30-day mortality compared with their matched control group (30-day mortality 40% vs 77.5%, plog-rank of<0.001).Conclusion: Use of MCS decreased by 50% from 2010 to 2017. Patients receiving MCS had more compromised haemodynamics in recent years. Early application of Impella CP was associated with reduced 30-day mortality compared with a matched control group.
KW - Aged
KW - Diffusion of Innovation
KW - Female
KW - Heart-Assist Devices/trends
KW - Humans
KW - Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/adverse effects
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis
KW - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
KW - Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends
KW - Prosthesis Design/trends
KW - Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects
KW - Recovery of Function
KW - Registries
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis
KW - Stroke Volume
KW - Time Factors
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Ventricular Function, Left
KW - cardiogenic shock
KW - myocardial ischaemia and infarction (IHD)
KW - coronary intervention (PCI)
KW - left ventricular assist device
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081219360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214
DO - 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32201591
SN - 2053-3624
VL - 7
SP - e001214
JO - Open Heart
JF - Open Heart
IS - 1
M1 - e001214
ER -