Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Conservative vs liberal fluid therapy in septic shock (CLASSIC) trial—Protocol and statistical analysis plan

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Impact of Physician-staffed Helicopters on Pre-hospital Patient Outcomes: a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Hypothermic to ischemic ratio and mortality in post-cardiac arrest patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Response letter to comments made by J. G. Förster, M. Pitkänen

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous (IV) fluid is a key intervention in the management of septic shock. The benefits and harms of lower versus higher fluid volumes are unknown and clinical equipoise exists. We describe the protocol and detailed statistical analysis plan for the Conservative versus Liberal Approach to fluid therapy of Septic Shock in the Intensive Care (CLASSIC) trial. The aim of the CLASSIC trial is to assess benefits and harms of IV fluid restriction versus standard care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock.

METHODS: CLASSIC trial is an investigator-initiated, international, randomised, stratified, and analyst-blinded trial. We will allocate 1554 adult patients with septic shock, who are planned to be or are admitted to an ICU, to IV fluid restriction versus standard care. The primary outcome is mortality at day 90. Secondary outcomes are serious adverse events, serious adverse reactions, days alive at day 90 without life support, days alive and out of hospital at day 90, and mortality, health-related quality of life, and cognitive function at 1 year. We will conduct the statistical analyses according to a pre-defined statistical analysis plan, including three interim analyses. For the primary analysis we will use logistic regression adjusted for the stratification variables comparing the two interventions in the intention-to-treat population.

DISCUSSION: The CLASSIC trial results will provide important evidence to guide clinicians' choice regarding IV fluid therapy in adults with septic shock. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

TidsskriftActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Udgave nummer9
Sider (fra-til)1262-1271
Antal sider10
StatusUdgivet - okt. 2019

ID: 58712226