Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Consequences for preoperative pain and function when postponing elective knee and hip arthroplasty

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  1. Patient costs and patient flow after implementation of S100B in Scandinavian head trauma guidelines

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  2. Introducing video calls in an intensive care unit during the COVID-19 lockdown: a qualitative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  3. Drug use in patients with short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  4. Prevalence and duration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in healthcare workers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  5. Simulation-based surgical training needs in otorhinolaryngology

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus outbreak causes postponement of elective surgery. We evaluated how pain, function and general health were impacted by postponing elective knee and hip arthroplasty in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis with no known surgery rescheduling date due to the coronavirus outbreak.

METHODS: This study included 194 patients from a Danish public hospital with postponed elective primary knee or hip arthroplasty due to the lockdown. Patients responded to questionnaires when their surgery was cancelled and before surgery. Changes in pain and function were evaluated with the Oxford Knee and Hip Scores (OKS, OHS) and their general health with the EuroQol 5-dimension scale (EQ5D). Additionally, we asked about the patients' concerns and whether they felt improved, unchanged or deteriorated during the waiting period.

RESULTS: Complete data were obtained for 110 (57%) patients, 59 and 51 awaiting knee or hip arthroplasty (median age 71 years, 62% were female), respectively. Arthroplasty was postponed for a median (range) 98 (63-161) days. A total of 34% were concerned that the postponement would lead to a poorer outcome. Mean OKS and OHS differences were 0 (95% confidence interval (CI): -1-1) and -1 (95% CI: -2-0) from surgery cancellation to re-scheduled surgery. The mean EQ5D index difference was 0.0 (95% CI: 0.0-0.1) for both groups. A total of 75 (68%) patients felt an important deterioration of their condition.

CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operatively, patients worried about experiencing an altered treatment outcome due to postponed surgery and felt that their condition had deteriorated during the waiting period although this was not reflected in patient-reported outcome measures.

FUNDING: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
ArtikelnummerA06210509
TidsskriftDanish Medical Journal
Vol/bind69
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)1-10
Antal sider10
ISSN1603-9629
StatusUdgivet - 19 maj 2022

Bibliografisk note

Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

ID: 78454367