Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Consensus clinical scoring for suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reactions

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Minimising droplet and virus spread during and after tracheal extubation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  2. Enhanced recovery after surgery components and perioperative outcomes: a nationwide observational study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache: a randomised, blinded, clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Use of the GRADE approach in systematic reviews and guidelines

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

  1. Perioperative anaphylaxis in children: Etiology, time sequence, and patterns of clinical reactivity

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. An EAACI position paper on the investigation of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reactions

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Undersøgelse og diagnostik af allergiske lidelser en kort gennemgang for tandlæger

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelFormidling

  4. Chlorhexidine Allergy: Mild Allergic Reactions Can Precede Anaphylaxis in the Healthcare Setting

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Drug provocation testing: risk stratification is key

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • P M Hopkins
  • P J Cooke
  • R C Clarke
  • A B Guttormsen
  • P R Platt
  • P Dewachter
  • D G Ebo
  • T Garcez
  • L H Garvey
  • D L Hepner
  • D A Khan
  • H Kolawole
  • P Kopac
  • M Krøigaard
  • J J Laguna
  • S D Marshall
  • P M Mertes
  • M A Rose
  • V Sabato
  • L C Savic
  • S Savic
  • T Takazawa
  • G W Volcheck
  • S Voltolini
  • P H M Sadleir
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Grading schemes for severity of suspected allergic reactions have been applied to the perioperative setting, but there is no scoring system that estimates the likelihood that the reaction is an immediate hypersensitivity reaction. Such a score would be useful in evaluating current and proposed tests for the diagnosis of suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reactions and culprit agents.

METHODS: We conducted a Delphi consensus process involving a panel of 25 international multidisciplinary experts in suspected perioperative allergy. Items were ranked according to appropriateness (on a scale of 1-9) and consensus, which informed development of a clinical scoring system. The scoring system was assessed by comparing scores generated for a series of clinical scenarios against ratings of panel members. Supplementary scores for mast cell tryptase were generated.

RESULTS: Two rounds of the Delphi process achieved stopping criteria for all statements. From an initial 60 statements, 43 were rated appropriate (median score 7 or more) and met agreement criteria (disagreement index <0.5); these were used in the clinical scoring system. The rating of clinical scenarios supported the validity of the scoring system. Although there was variability in the interpretation of changes in mast cell tryptase by the panel, we were able to include supplementary scores for mast cell tryptase.

CONCLUSION: We used a robust consensus development process to devise a clinical scoring system for suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reactions. This will enable objectivity and uniformity in the assessment of the sensitivity of diagnostic tests.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Vol/bind123
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)e29-e37
ISSN0007-0912
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jul. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

ID: 58998953