Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Conization and healthcare use: a population-based register study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Human papillomavirus vaccination in immigrants and descendants of immigrants in Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Awareness of human papillomavirus after introduction of HPV vaccination: a large population-based survey of Scandinavian women

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Outcomes in cervical screening using various cytology technologies: What's age got to do with it?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Intake of wine, beer and spirits and risk of gastric cancer.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

  1. New insights into early recovery after robotic surgery for endometrial cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Cervical screening in Denmark - a success followed by stagnation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in human papillomavirus self-sampling of screening non-attenders

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. HPV-vaccination forebygger cervixcancer – effekt og evidens i et dansk perspektiv

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelFormidling

Vis graf over relationer

The aim of this study was to assess whether negative psychological consequences of conization reported in questionnaire studies translated into increased use of the healthcare services that could relieve such symptoms. This was a population-based register study comparing women undergoing conization with a control group of women with normal cytology results. Data were derived from Danish registers. Using the difference-in-differences method, we measured contacts with general practitioners (GPs), hospitals, psychiatrist/psychologists, and use of anxiolytic and antidepressant prescription drugs over 5 years 'before' and 'after' the conization in the study group, and in comparable periods in the control group. During the 'before' period, women who later had a conization had greater contact with GPs and hospitals, and slightly more contact with psychiatrist/psychologists, than control women. In both groups, healthcare use increased significantly from the 'before' to the 'after' period. For contacts with GPs and hospitals, the increase was significantly larger for the conization group than for the control group, but this could be attributed to the standard postconization follow-up process. In the 'before' period, women who later had a conization used fewer drugs than women of the control-group, but their drug use increased similarly over time. The conization event did not result in an increased use of the healthcare services that could relieve potential negative side effects. However, women who underwent a conization seemed to constitute a select group as they already used GPs and hospitals more frequently, and anxiolytic and antidepressant drugs less frequently, than other women in the years 'before' the conization event.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Cancer Prevention
Vol/bind28
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)124-130
Antal sider7
ISSN0959-8278
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2019

ID: 52090633