Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Comparison of the Anterior Septal Line and Mitral Isthmus Line for Perimitral Atrial Flutter Ablation Using Robotic Magnetic Navigation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

DOI

  1. Validation of the national Danish ablation database: a retrospective, registry-based validation study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  2. Electrocardiographic characteristics of trained and untrained standardbred racehorses

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  3. Periodic Repolarization Dynamics Identifies ICD-responders in Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A DANISH Substudy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Background: Perimitral atrial flutter (PMAFL) is one of the most common macro-reentrant left atrial tachycardias. Mitral isthmus (MI) linear ablation is a common strategy for the treatment of PMAFLs, and anterior septum (AS) linear ablation has emerged as a novel ablation approach. We aimed at assessing the effectiveness of AS linear ablation using robotic magnetic navigation for PMAFL ablation.

Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 36 consecutive patients presented with AFL as the unique arrhythmia or accompanied with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent catheter ablation were enrolled. Patients were classified into two groups according to the different ablation strategies, the MI line group (10 patients) and the AS line group (26 patients).

Results: The clinical baseline characteristics of patients in the two groups were nearly identical. There were no significant differences in procedure time (148.7 ± 46.1 vs. 123.2 ± 30.1 min, P=0.058) or radiofrequency ablation time (25.9 ± 11.4 vs. 23.5 ± 12.6 min) between the two groups. Fluoroscopy time was longer in the MI line group (8.0 ± 4.4 vs. 5.1 ± 2.7 min, P=0.024), and the acute success rate was higher in the AS line group versus the MI line group (96.2% vs. 70%, P=0.025). The long-term freedom from arrhythmia survival rate was higher in the AS line group (73%) than in the MI line group (40%) after a mean follow-up time of 37.4 months with a 3-month blanking period (P=0.049).

Conclusions: AS linear ablation is an effective and safe strategy for PMAFL ablation using robotic magnetic navigation.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer1793590
TidsskriftJournal of Interventional Cardiology
Vol/bind2022
Sider (fra-til)1793590
ISSN0896-4327
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2022 Shipeng Dang et al.

ID: 74854627