Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Comparison of single-port and conventional laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Carbon Dioxide Embolism Associated With Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery: A Report From the International Registries

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Inflammatory response after transanal total mesorectal excision

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

  3. Transanal completion proctectomy with close rectal dissection and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Minimally invasive assessment of hepatic function in children with indocyanine green elimination: a validation study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Within the last two decades, surgical treatment of colorectal cancer has changed dramatically from large abdominal incisions to minimal access surgery. In the recent years, single port (SP) surgery has spawned from conventional laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare conventional with SP laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (LAPR) for rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center non-randomised retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected data on 53 patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer; 41 with conventional laparoscopy and 12 with SP surgery.

RESULTS: Patients' characteristics were in general comparable, but patients in the conventional laparoscopy-group had a significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists-score. The operative time was slightly shorter in the conventional laparoscopy-group, but no differences were found in oncological margins of the resected specimen, in length of stay or readmission rate.

CONCLUSIONS: SP LAPR appeared to be safe and feasible in selected patients. Adequate oncologic resections can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Larger randomised controlled trials with longer follow-up are needed to determine the beneficial role of this new procedure.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Minimal Access Surgery
Vol/bind14
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)27-32
ISSN0972-9941
StatusUdgivet - 1 jan. 2018

ID: 51663139