Comparison of liquid chromatography-microchip/mass spectrometry to conventional liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for the analysis of steroids

Linda Ahonen*, Pekka Keski-Rahkonen, Taija Saarelainen, Jenni Paviala, Raimo A. Ketola, Seppo Auriola, Matti Poutanen, Risto Kostianen

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde
16 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

The easibility of a microfluidic-based liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization/mass spectrometric system (HPLC-Chip/ESI/MS) was studied and compared to a conventional narrow-bore liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization/mass spectrometric (LC-ESI/MS) system for the analysis of steroids. The limits of detection (LODs) for oxime derivatized steroids, expressed as concentrations, were slightly higher with the HPLC-Chip/MS system (50-300. pM) using an injection volume of 0.5μL than with the conventional LC-ESI/MS (10-150. pM) using an injection volume of 40μL. However, when the LODs are expressed as injected amounts, the sensitivity of the HPLC-Chip/MS system was about 50 times higher than with the conventional LC-ESI/MS system. The results indicate that the use of HPLC-Chip/MS system is clearly advantageous only in the analysis of low-volume samples. Both methods showed good linearity and good quantitative and chromatographic repeatability. In addition to the instrument comparisons with oxime derivatized steroids, the feasibility of the HPLC-Chip/MS system in the analysis of non-derivatized and oxime derivatized steroids was compared. The HPLC-Chip/MS method developed for non-derivatized steroids was also applied to the quantitative analysis of 15 mouse plasma samples.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAnalytica Chimica Acta
Vol/bind721
Sider (fra-til)115-121
Antal sider7
ISSN0003-2670
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 6 apr. 2012
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Comparison of liquid chromatography-microchip/mass spectrometry to conventional liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for the analysis of steroids'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater