Comparing self-reported energy intake using an online dietary tool with energy expenditure by an activity tracker

Aikaterina Vasileiou; Dominique Searle; Sofus C Larsen; Faidon Magkos; Graham Horgan; R James Stubbs; Inês Santos; António L Palmeira; Berit L Heitmann

doi:10.1016/j.nut.2023.112258

Comparing self-reported energy intake using an online dietary tool with energy expenditure by an activity tracker

Aikaterina Vasileiou, Dominique Searle, Sofus C Larsen, Faidon Magkos, Graham Horgan, R James Stubbs, Inês Santos, António L Palmeira, Berit L Heitmann

Parker Instituttet

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare self-reported total energy intake (TEI) collected using an online multiple-pass 24-h dietary recall tool (Intake24) with total energy expenditure (TEE) estimated from Fitbit Charge 2-improved algorithms in adults from the NoHoW trial (12-mo weight maintenance after free-living weight loss).

METHODS: Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the level of agreement between TEI and TEE at baseline and after 12 mo. The ratio of TEI to TEE was also calculated.

RESULTS: Data from 1323 participants (71% female) was included in the analysis (mean ± SD: age 45 ± 12 y, body mass index 29.7 ± 5.4 kg/m2, initial weight loss 11.5 ± 6.5 kg). The TEI was lower than TEE on average by 33%, with limits of agreement ranging from -91% to +25%. Men, younger individuals, those with higher body mass index, those with the greater weight loss before enrollment, and those who gained weight during the study underestimated to a greater extent.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to the ongoing research examining the validity of technology-based dietary assessment tools.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	112258
Tidsskrift	Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)
Vol/bind	118
Sider (fra-til)	112258
ISSN	0899-9007
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2023.112258
Status	Udgivet - feb. 2024

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1016/j.nut.2023.112258

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

Vasileiou, A., Searle, D., Larsen, S. C., Magkos, F., Horgan, G., Stubbs, R. J., Santos, I., Palmeira, A. L., & Heitmann, B. L. (2024). Comparing self-reported energy intake using an online dietary tool with energy expenditure by an activity tracker. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 118, 112258. Artikel 112258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2023.112258

@article{3c2a5976050741cbb2d79309d4252323,

title = "Comparing self-reported energy intake using an online dietary tool with energy expenditure by an activity tracker",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare self-reported total energy intake (TEI) collected using an online multiple-pass 24-h dietary recall tool (Intake24) with total energy expenditure (TEE) estimated from Fitbit Charge 2-improved algorithms in adults from the NoHoW trial (12-mo weight maintenance after free-living weight loss).METHODS: Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the level of agreement between TEI and TEE at baseline and after 12 mo. The ratio of TEI to TEE was also calculated.RESULTS: Data from 1323 participants (71% female) was included in the analysis (mean ± SD: age 45 ± 12 y, body mass index 29.7 ± 5.4 kg/m2, initial weight loss 11.5 ± 6.5 kg). The TEI was lower than TEE on average by 33%, with limits of agreement ranging from -91% to +25%. Men, younger individuals, those with higher body mass index, those with the greater weight loss before enrollment, and those who gained weight during the study underestimated to a greater extent.CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to the ongoing research examining the validity of technology-based dietary assessment tools.",

keywords = "Adult, Male, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Self Report, Fitness Trackers, Energy Intake, Energy Metabolism, Weight Loss",

author = "Aikaterina Vasileiou and Dominique Searle and Larsen, {Sofus C} and Faidon Magkos and Graham Horgan and Stubbs, {R James} and In{\^e}s Santos and Palmeira, {Ant{\'o}nio L} and Heitmann, {Berit L}",

year = "2024",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.nut.2023.112258",

language = "English",

volume = "118",

pages = "112258",

journal = "Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)",

issn = "0899-9007",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing self-reported energy intake using an online dietary tool with energy expenditure by an activity tracker

AU - Vasileiou, Aikaterina

AU - Searle, Dominique

AU - Larsen, Sofus C

AU - Magkos, Faidon

AU - Horgan, Graham

AU - Stubbs, R James

AU - Santos, Inês

AU - Palmeira, António L

AU - Heitmann, Berit L

PY - 2024/2

Y1 - 2024/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare self-reported total energy intake (TEI) collected using an online multiple-pass 24-h dietary recall tool (Intake24) with total energy expenditure (TEE) estimated from Fitbit Charge 2-improved algorithms in adults from the NoHoW trial (12-mo weight maintenance after free-living weight loss).METHODS: Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the level of agreement between TEI and TEE at baseline and after 12 mo. The ratio of TEI to TEE was also calculated.RESULTS: Data from 1323 participants (71% female) was included in the analysis (mean ± SD: age 45 ± 12 y, body mass index 29.7 ± 5.4 kg/m2, initial weight loss 11.5 ± 6.5 kg). The TEI was lower than TEE on average by 33%, with limits of agreement ranging from -91% to +25%. Men, younger individuals, those with higher body mass index, those with the greater weight loss before enrollment, and those who gained weight during the study underestimated to a greater extent.CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to the ongoing research examining the validity of technology-based dietary assessment tools.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare self-reported total energy intake (TEI) collected using an online multiple-pass 24-h dietary recall tool (Intake24) with total energy expenditure (TEE) estimated from Fitbit Charge 2-improved algorithms in adults from the NoHoW trial (12-mo weight maintenance after free-living weight loss).METHODS: Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the level of agreement between TEI and TEE at baseline and after 12 mo. The ratio of TEI to TEE was also calculated.RESULTS: Data from 1323 participants (71% female) was included in the analysis (mean ± SD: age 45 ± 12 y, body mass index 29.7 ± 5.4 kg/m2, initial weight loss 11.5 ± 6.5 kg). The TEI was lower than TEE on average by 33%, with limits of agreement ranging from -91% to +25%. Men, younger individuals, those with higher body mass index, those with the greater weight loss before enrollment, and those who gained weight during the study underestimated to a greater extent.CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to the ongoing research examining the validity of technology-based dietary assessment tools.

KW - Adult

KW - Male

KW - Humans

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Self Report

KW - Fitness Trackers

KW - Energy Intake

KW - Energy Metabolism

KW - Weight Loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177737650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112258

DO - 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112258

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38007995

SN - 0899-9007

VL - 118

SP - 112258

JO - Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)

JF - Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)

M1 - 112258

ER -

Comparing self-reported energy intake using an online dietary tool with energy expenditure by an activity tracker

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater