Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Comparing a Single Clinician Versus a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference Approach for Dementia Diagnostics

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Causes of Death in People with Dementia from 2002 to 2015: A Nationwide Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Dementia and COVID-19, a Bidirectional Liaison: Risk Factors, Biomarkers, and Optimal Health Care

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Is the Frontal Lobe the Primary Target of SARS-CoV-2?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Mortality in Dementia from 1996 to 2015: A National Registry-Based Cohort Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Hospital readmissions following infections in dementia: a nationwide and registry-based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Associations between oxidative stress and perceived stress in patients with bipolar disorder and healthy control individuals

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Barriers in access to dementia care in minority ethnic groups in Denmark: a qualitative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Guidelines should be guidelines: Time to leave the terms "consensus" and "position" for other purposes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based recommendations on the optimal evaluation approach for dementia diagnostics are limited. This impedes a harmonized workup across clinics and nations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a multidisciplinary consensus conference compared to a single clinician approach.

METHODS: In this prospective study, we enrolled 457 patients with suspected cognitive decline, from two European memory clinics. A diagnostic evaluation was performed at baseline independently in two ways: 1) by a single clinician and 2) at a multidisciplinary consensus conference. A syndrome diagnosis and an etiological diagnosis was made. The confidence in the diagnosis was recorded using a visual analogue scale. An expert panel re-evaluation diagnosis served as reference for the baseline syndrome diagnosis and a 12-24-month follow-up diagnosis for the etiological diagnosis.

RESULTS: 439 patients completed the study. We observed 12.5%discrepancy (k = 0.81) comparing the baseline syndrome diagnoses of the single clinician to the consensus conference, and 22.3%discrepancy (k = 0.68) for the baseline etiological diagnosis. The accuracy of the baseline etiological diagnosis was significantly higher at the consensus conference and was driven mainly by increased accuracy in the MCI group. Confidence in the etiological diagnosis at baseline was significantly higher at the consensus conference (p < 0.005), especially for the frontotemporal dementia diagnosis.

CONCLUSION: The multidisciplinary consensus conference performed better on diagnostic accuracy of disease etiology and increased clinicians' confidence. This highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary diagnostic evaluation approach for dementia diagnostics, especially when evaluating patients in the MCI stage.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Alzheimer's Disease
Vol/bind83
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)741-751
Antal sider11
ISSN1387-2877
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

ID: 68352579