TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative 1H NMR Metabolomics Between Scandinavian Propolis and Australian Propolis
T2 - The Quest to Identify Radical Scavenging Compounds
AU - Vind, Jonas
AU - Engelsen, Søren Balling
AU - Jørgensen, Henrik Munch
AU - Antvorskov, Julie Christine
AU - Josefsen, Knud
AU - Aru, Violetta
N1 - © 2026 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2026/1/28
Y1 - 2026/1/28
N2 - Propolis from Apis mellifera and cerumen from Tetragonula carbonaria are complex mixtures of beeswax, plant resins, and bee secretions whose composition varies with geography and species. Understanding these differences is important for exploring their bioactive potential. This study employs untargeted quantitative 1H NMR metabolomics to characterize A. mellifera propolis from Scandinavia (Denmark and Norway) and Australia, as well as cerumen from T. carbonaria in Australia. Hydrophilic and hydrophobic extracts were analyzed to assess compositional differences across geographical origin and bee species, and to link specific metabolites to radical scavenging activity (RSA). Principal component analysis (PCA) of the 1H NMR spectra showed a marked separation between Scandinavian and Australian propolis. Hydrophilic extracts showed that Scandinavian propolis contains higher levels of aromatic compounds, whereas Australian propolis is richer in carbohydrates. In contrast, cerumen from T. carbonaria exhibits higher amounts of terpenoids. Hydrophobic extracts revealed that Australian propolis has the highest wax content, with shorter chains and more free fatty acids, while Scandinavian propolis samples display uniform wax structures and the highest aromatic content. Multivariate regression using recursive weighted partial least squares (rPLS) to RSA prediction highlighted signals attributable to ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid, which were confirmed by statistical total correlation spectroscopy (STOCSY). These findings demonstrate the utility of quantitative 1H NMR metabolomics for distinguishing botanical and geographic chemotypes of propolis and cerumen. The findings further show that Scandinavian propolis is more consistent with respect to metabolite composition compared to Australian samples, presumably reflecting differences in resin sources for foraging.
AB - Propolis from Apis mellifera and cerumen from Tetragonula carbonaria are complex mixtures of beeswax, plant resins, and bee secretions whose composition varies with geography and species. Understanding these differences is important for exploring their bioactive potential. This study employs untargeted quantitative 1H NMR metabolomics to characterize A. mellifera propolis from Scandinavia (Denmark and Norway) and Australia, as well as cerumen from T. carbonaria in Australia. Hydrophilic and hydrophobic extracts were analyzed to assess compositional differences across geographical origin and bee species, and to link specific metabolites to radical scavenging activity (RSA). Principal component analysis (PCA) of the 1H NMR spectra showed a marked separation between Scandinavian and Australian propolis. Hydrophilic extracts showed that Scandinavian propolis contains higher levels of aromatic compounds, whereas Australian propolis is richer in carbohydrates. In contrast, cerumen from T. carbonaria exhibits higher amounts of terpenoids. Hydrophobic extracts revealed that Australian propolis has the highest wax content, with shorter chains and more free fatty acids, while Scandinavian propolis samples display uniform wax structures and the highest aromatic content. Multivariate regression using recursive weighted partial least squares (rPLS) to RSA prediction highlighted signals attributable to ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid, which were confirmed by statistical total correlation spectroscopy (STOCSY). These findings demonstrate the utility of quantitative 1H NMR metabolomics for distinguishing botanical and geographic chemotypes of propolis and cerumen. The findings further show that Scandinavian propolis is more consistent with respect to metabolite composition compared to Australian samples, presumably reflecting differences in resin sources for foraging.
U2 - 10.1002/mrc.70082
DO - 10.1002/mrc.70082
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41605461
SN - 0749-1581
JO - Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC
JF - Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC
ER -