TY - JOUR
T1 - Combined single-and dual-energy CT workflow for dose calculation in radiotherapy
AU - Sand, Hella
AU - Edmund, Jens
AU - Appelt, Ane
AU - Wohlfahrt, Patrick
AU - Taasti, Vicki Trier
AU - Poulsen, Laurids Østergaard
AU - Søndergaard, Jimmi
AU - Nielsen, Martin Skovmos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by MJS Publishing on behalf of Acta Oncologica.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background and purpose: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is increasingly used in radiotherapy delineation due to its enhanced soft tissue contrast. DECT also supports direct dose calculation. However, as most current DECT scanners allow for use in only certain body regions, conventional sin-gle-energy computed tomography (SECT) is still needed for some patients. A safe clinical introduction of DECT thus requires a combined workflow. This study therefore investigates whether a unified Hounsfield look-up table (HLUT) can be applied across SECT and DECT reconstructions. Patient/material and methods: A Gammex Advanced Electron Density phantom containing tissue-equivalent inserts was scanned using SECT (70–140 kVp and Sn100–Sn140 kVp, Sn meaning tin-filtered) and dual-spiral DECT to identify matching HLUTs for three SECT methods, including a standard reconstruction (only 120 kVp; Method 1), and kVp-independent reconstructions providing mass density (MD; Method 2) or relative electron density (RED; Method 3). Dose agreement was subsequently tested on two anthropomorphic phantoms. For each SECT method, DECT reconstructions were compared through voxel-wise analysis of computed tomography (CT) numbers, and by performing dose calculations in three anatomical regions: head, thorax, and abdomen/pelvis. Results: Across all three SECT methods, DECT reconstructions with acceptable clinical CT number agreement were identified. Corresponding dose calculations between SECT-and DECT-based plans showed minimal differences. Interpretation: This phantom study demonstrates that a unified HLUT can be applied across SECT and DECT using standard 120 kVp, MD, or RED reconstructions. This approach may streamline clinical work-flows and support a safe and practical transition to DECT-based treatment planning.
AB - Background and purpose: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is increasingly used in radiotherapy delineation due to its enhanced soft tissue contrast. DECT also supports direct dose calculation. However, as most current DECT scanners allow for use in only certain body regions, conventional sin-gle-energy computed tomography (SECT) is still needed for some patients. A safe clinical introduction of DECT thus requires a combined workflow. This study therefore investigates whether a unified Hounsfield look-up table (HLUT) can be applied across SECT and DECT reconstructions. Patient/material and methods: A Gammex Advanced Electron Density phantom containing tissue-equivalent inserts was scanned using SECT (70–140 kVp and Sn100–Sn140 kVp, Sn meaning tin-filtered) and dual-spiral DECT to identify matching HLUTs for three SECT methods, including a standard reconstruction (only 120 kVp; Method 1), and kVp-independent reconstructions providing mass density (MD; Method 2) or relative electron density (RED; Method 3). Dose agreement was subsequently tested on two anthropomorphic phantoms. For each SECT method, DECT reconstructions were compared through voxel-wise analysis of computed tomography (CT) numbers, and by performing dose calculations in three anatomical regions: head, thorax, and abdomen/pelvis. Results: Across all three SECT methods, DECT reconstructions with acceptable clinical CT number agreement were identified. Corresponding dose calculations between SECT-and DECT-based plans showed minimal differences. Interpretation: This phantom study demonstrates that a unified HLUT can be applied across SECT and DECT using standard 120 kVp, MD, or RED reconstructions. This approach may streamline clinical work-flows and support a safe and practical transition to DECT-based treatment planning.
KW - algorithm
KW - computed tomography
KW - imaging
KW - phantom
KW - radiotherapy planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105013687983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43827
DO - 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43827
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40823803
AN - SCOPUS:105013687983
SN - 0284-186X
VL - 64
SP - 1079
EP - 1086
JO - Acta oncologica
JF - Acta oncologica
ER -