TY - JOUR
T1 - Colonoscopy results are not enhanced by use of magnet endoguide in specialist practice
AU - Bak-Christensen, Anders
AU - Knudsen, Elisabeth
AU - Hendel, Jakob
AU - Ifaoui, Inge Bøtker-Rasmussen
AU - Lehrskov-Schmidt, Lars
AU - Hendel, Lene
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - It is discussed whether the use of a magnetic positioning device (OLYMPUS; UPD (unit of magnetic positioning device)) enhances the success of the colonoscopic procedure. Concern for patient compliance and endoscopic efficiency has been voiced in connection with the implementation of colon cancer screening. UPD has been proposed as a tool for optimization of results and reduction of patient discomfort. In this study, we aimed to qualify the debate by examining the success rate and patient discomfort in an unselected colonoscopy population referred to specialist clinics with experienced investigators. Furthermore, the study assessed the effect of using a UPD.
AB - It is discussed whether the use of a magnetic positioning device (OLYMPUS; UPD (unit of magnetic positioning device)) enhances the success of the colonoscopic procedure. Concern for patient compliance and endoscopic efficiency has been voiced in connection with the implementation of colon cancer screening. UPD has been proposed as a tool for optimization of results and reduction of patient discomfort. In this study, we aimed to qualify the debate by examining the success rate and patient discomfort in an unselected colonoscopy population referred to specialist clinics with experienced investigators. Furthermore, the study assessed the effect of using a UPD.
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 23743108
SN - 1603-9629
VL - 60
SP - A4611
JO - Danish Medical Bulletin (Online)
JF - Danish Medical Bulletin (Online)
IS - 6
ER -