Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Colonoscope retraction technique and predicting adenoma detection rate: a multicenter study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Franseen versus fork-tip: Crowning the king of crown-cut needles?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

  2. Propofol and lidocaine for ERCP: Two is better than one?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

  3. Time to standardize through-the-needle biopsy specimen handling Response

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  1. Identifying curriculum content for a cross-specialty robotic-assisted surgery training program: a Delphi study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Quantifying surgical skill in macular surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. A core curriculum for basic EUS skills: An international consensus using the Delphi methodology

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Defining medical simulators for simulation-based education in EUS: Theoretical approach and a narrative review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  5. Overcoming Gender Bias in Assessment of Surgical Skills

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The success of preventing colorectal cancer relies on the expertise of the colonoscopists. Studies suggest that the retraction technique is a powerful indicator of expertise in distinguishing endoscopists with various adenoma detection rates (ADRs). We aimed to develop a retraction technique score and explore the correlation between endoscopists' retraction technique and their ADRs.

METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter study, 8 colonoscopist nurses and physicians with various ADRs were included. Data from patients admitted for a colonoscopy, as part of the Danish nationwide screening program, were gathered directly from the Olympus ScopeGuide system (UPD-3; Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) providing XYZ-coordinates from the coils along the length of the colonoscope. Motor skill measures were developed based on tip retraction, retraction efficiency, and retraction distance. The principal component analysis was used to study the association among the 3 measures and the historical ADR to create a combined score, the colonoscopy retraction score (CoRS).

RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-three recordings were analyzed. We demonstrated a significant and strong correlation between CoRS and ADR (.90, P < .01). Conversely, withdrawal time did not correlate significantly with ADR (.33, P = .42). In procedures without polypectomies or biopsy sampling, a significant and strong correlation was found between CoRS and ADR (.88, P < .01) and between withdrawal time and ADR (.75, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a novel, real-time computerized and unbiased assessment tool for colonoscopy withdrawal. CoRS strongly correlated with ADR with and without therapeutic interventions during withdrawal and could be used to ensure quality instead of minimal withdrawal time. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03587935.).

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Vol/bind95
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)1002-1010
Antal sider9
ISSN0016-5107
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2022

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ID: 70401155