Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Cognitive remediation plus standard treatment versus standard treatment alone for individuals at ultra-high risk of developing psychosis: Results of the FOCUS randomised clinical trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Schizophrenia polygenic risk scores, urbanicity and treatment-resistant schizophrenia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Emotion recognition latency, but not accuracy, relates to real life functioning in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. First-rank symptoms and self-disorders in schizophrenia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. A phenome-wide association and Mendelian Randomisation study of polygenic risk for depression in UK Biobank

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Sex differences in trauma exposure and symptomatology in trauma-affected refugees

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Effectiveness of cognitive remediation in the ultra-high risk state for psychosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  4. The Duffy-null genotype and risk of infection

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. The autism diagnostic observation schedule: Patterns in individuals with anorexia nervosa

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis have significant cognitive deficits that can impede functional recovery. Applying cognitive remediation (CR) before the onset of frank psychosis may improve the cognitive and functional prognosis of UHR individuals, however, little is known about the feasibility and efficacy of CR for this population.

METHODS: In this randomised, clinical trial 146 individuals at UHR for psychosis aged 18-40 years were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus cognitive remediation. The CR targeted neurocognitive and social cognitive remediation. Assessments were carried out at 6- and 12-months post baseline.

RESULTS: A total of 73 UHR individuals were assigned to TAU and 73 assigned to TAU + cognitive remediation. Compared to the control group, cognitive remediation did not result in significant improvement on the primary outcome; the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia composite score at 6-month follow-up (b = -0.125, 95%CI: -0.23 to 0.172, p = 0.41). Nor did the intervention improve secondary outcomes in clinical symptoms or functioning. Exploratory analyses found emotion recognition latencies to be significantly more reduced in the intervention group at 6-months. At 12-months, the intervention group exhibited significantly better performance on two measures of executive function and visual memory.

CONCLUSION: The 20-session treatment protocol was not well received in the UHR group, and unsurprisingly global measures did not improve. The benefit found in isolated neuro- and social cognitive measures after even a few sessions points to a potential for cognitive malleability if people can be engaged sufficiently to practice the skills. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02098408.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSchizophrenia Research
ISSN0920-9964
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 29 aug. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

ID: 60812918