Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Clinical validation of three-dimensional ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Mortality and complications after aortic bifurcated bypass procedures for chronic aortoiliac occlusive disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Regarding "Progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis despite optimal medical therapy"

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Sex differences in 30-day and 5-year outcomes after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the EUROSTAR study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Micro-lightguide spectrophotometry for tissue perfusion in ischemic limbs

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Vascular function in adults with cyanotic congenital heart disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Carotid atherosclerosis markers and adverse cardiovascular events

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  3. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Versus Carotid Plaque Burden for Predicting Cardiovascular Risk

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. How vascular surgeons can learn ultrasound

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) examination is a relatively new modality that can be used for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surveillance, and may offer improved reproducibility over conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) examination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interoperator reproducibility of maximum anterior-to-posterior diameter by nonphysician ultrasound technicians in a typical vascular laboratory setting, on patients with infrarenal AAAs using 3D-US and 2D-US examination.

METHODS: A total of 134 consecutive patients with asymptomatic infrarenal AAAs were screened. Of the 134 patients, 28 (21%) were screen failures. From the remaining 106 patients, 3 (2.8%) had missing data and 13 (12.3%) had technically unacceptable image quality. As a result, 90 patients were included for final analysis. Ultrasound image acquisitions were performed during the single visit. The 2D-US images were evaluated at the time of examination by the respective ultrasound technicians who acquired them. All 3D-US images were evaluated offline by both ultrasound technicians after a wash-out period of at least 6 weeks.

RESULTS: Excellent interoperator reproducibility was observed for measuring maximum diameter using 3D-US (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.97), and good agreement among ultrasound technicians (mean difference, -0.08 mm; limits of agreement, -3.17; 3.00 mm). When using 3D-US examination, 74 of the 90 patients (82%) were estimated within 2 mm of interoperator variability. Of 90 patients, 52 (58%) were estimated to be within the same variability by 2D-US examination. Estimating AAA diameter using 3D-US was superior to 2D-US with respect to interoperator reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS: Both 3D-US and 2D-US examination demonstrated good reproducibility among two vascular ultrasound technicians with superior agreement from 3D-US examination. The present results support the broader use of 3D-US in standard AAA surveillance programs.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Vascular Surgery
Vol/bind71
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)180-188
Antal sider9
ISSN0741-5214
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ID: 59374292