TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical practice, barriers to implementation, and priorities for equitable access of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
T2 - An analysis of the global status by the ESTRO SBRT Focus Group
AU - Franzese, Ciro
AU - Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
AU - Verellen, Dirk
AU - Wiersema, Lisa
AU - Hörner-Rieber, Juliane
AU - Romero, Alejandra Méndez
AU - Pasquier, David
AU - Bruynzeel, Anna
AU - Boda-Heggemann, Judit
AU - Depuydt, Tom
AU - Sibolt, Patrik
AU - Douir, Najma
AU - Kuncman, Łukasz
AU - Beijst, Casper
AU - Stephens, Harley
AU - de la Pinta, Carolina
AU - Cuccia, Francesco
AU - Milder, Maaike
AU - Nicosia, Luca
AU - Onishi, Hiroshi
AU - Louie, Alexander V.
AU - Sahgal, Arjun
AU - Lo, Simon S.
AU - Slotman, Ben J.
AU - Guckenberger, Matthias
AU - Scorsetti, Marta
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/12/14
Y1 - 2025/12/14
N2 - Background: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) has become an established treatment for several primary and metastatic malignancies; however, considerable heterogeneity remains in its definition, clinical indications, and technical delivery. Methods: In May 2025, the SBRT Focus Group of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), in collaboration with International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS), the Radiosurgery Society (RSS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO), conducted a global survey. A 44-item questionnaire explored SBRT indications, technical aspects, dose/fractionation, and barriers to implementation. Descriptive statistics summarized the responses. Results: Overall, 289 professionals from 59 countries participated. Routine use of SBRT was reported by 96.6 % of respondents, with lung, bone, liver and prostate as the most frequent indications. Pancreatic tumor (48.4 %), renal cell carcinoma (46.4 %), and ventricular tachycardia (12.4 %) represented emerging indications. C-arm linacs (89.2 %) and in-room Cone beam CT (CBCT) (92.0 %) were the dominant technologies. Motion management relied mainly on 4D-CT internal target volume (ITV) (88.9 %) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) (57.8 %). Fractionation was consistent for lung and prostate but heterogeneous for liver, and pancreas. Only 3.5 % reported routine use of online adaptive SBRT, while 61.5 % reported artificial intelligence (AI) use, mainly for organs-at-risk delineation. Key barriers included limited clinical trial funding (35.2 %), high equipment costs (34.2 %), insufficient reimbursement (27.7 %), and workforce shortages (33.9 %). Conclusions: This ESTRO international survey provides the first global overview of SBRT practices. It demonstrates broad adoption but also substantial variability, highlighting the need for consensus guidelines, greater trial access, and expanded education to harmonize SBRT delivery and ensure equitable care worldwide.
AB - Background: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) has become an established treatment for several primary and metastatic malignancies; however, considerable heterogeneity remains in its definition, clinical indications, and technical delivery. Methods: In May 2025, the SBRT Focus Group of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), in collaboration with International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS), the Radiosurgery Society (RSS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO), conducted a global survey. A 44-item questionnaire explored SBRT indications, technical aspects, dose/fractionation, and barriers to implementation. Descriptive statistics summarized the responses. Results: Overall, 289 professionals from 59 countries participated. Routine use of SBRT was reported by 96.6 % of respondents, with lung, bone, liver and prostate as the most frequent indications. Pancreatic tumor (48.4 %), renal cell carcinoma (46.4 %), and ventricular tachycardia (12.4 %) represented emerging indications. C-arm linacs (89.2 %) and in-room Cone beam CT (CBCT) (92.0 %) were the dominant technologies. Motion management relied mainly on 4D-CT internal target volume (ITV) (88.9 %) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) (57.8 %). Fractionation was consistent for lung and prostate but heterogeneous for liver, and pancreas. Only 3.5 % reported routine use of online adaptive SBRT, while 61.5 % reported artificial intelligence (AI) use, mainly for organs-at-risk delineation. Key barriers included limited clinical trial funding (35.2 %), high equipment costs (34.2 %), insufficient reimbursement (27.7 %), and workforce shortages (33.9 %). Conclusions: This ESTRO international survey provides the first global overview of SBRT practices. It demonstrates broad adoption but also substantial variability, highlighting the need for consensus guidelines, greater trial access, and expanded education to harmonize SBRT delivery and ensure equitable care worldwide.
KW - Ablative radiotherapy
KW - Advanced radiotherapy
KW - Radiation oncology
KW - SABR
KW - SBRT
KW - Stereotactic body radiation therapy
KW - Stereotactic radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105025127734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101096
DO - 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101096
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41502557
AN - SCOPUS:105025127734
SN - 2405-6308
VL - 57
JO - Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
JF - Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
M1 - 101096
ER -