Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Clinical and psychometric validation of the psychotic depression assessment scale

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Primary prevention of depression: An umbrella review of controlled interventions

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Stress management versus cognitive restructuring in trauma-affected refugees - A follow-up study on a pragmatic randomised trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Structural changes induced by electroconvulsive therapy are associated with clinical outcome

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Electroconvulsive therapy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Increased blood BDNF in healthy individuals with a family history of depression

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Regional brain volumes, diffusivity, and metabolite changes after electroconvulsive therapy for severe depression

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have indicated that the 11-item Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS), consisting of the 6-item melancholia subscale (HAM-D6) of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and 5 psychosis items from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), is a valid measure for the severity of psychotic depression. The aim of this study was to subject the PDAS, and its depression (HAM-D6) and psychosis (BPRS5) subscales to further validation.

METHODS: Patients diagnosed with psychotic depression at Danish psychiatric hospitals participated in semi-structured interviews. Video recordings of these interviews were assessed by two experienced psychiatrists (global severity rating of psychotic depression, depressive symptoms and psychotic symptoms) and by two young physicians (rating on 27 symptom items, including the 11 PDAS items). The clinical validity and responsiveness of the PDAS and its subscales was investigated by Spearman correlation analysis of the global severity ratings and the PDAS, HAM-D6, and BPRS5 total scores. The unidimensionality of the scales was tested by item response theory analysis (Mokken).

RESULTS: Ratings from 39 participants with unipolar psychotic depression and nine participants with bipolar psychotic depression were included in the analysis. The Spearman correlation analysis indicated that the PDAS, HAM-D6 and BPRS5 were clinically valid (correlation coefficients from 0.78 to 0.85, p<0.001) and responsive (correlation coefficients from 0.72 to 0.86, p<0.001) measures of psychotic depression. According to the Mokken analysis, all three scales were unidimensional.

CONCLUSIONS: The clinical validity, responsiveness and unidimensionality of the PDAS and its subscales were confirmed in an independent sample of patients with psychotic depression.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Affective Disorders
Vol/bind173
Sider (fra-til)261-8
Antal sider8
ISSN0165-0327
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2015

ID: 44924139