Clinical and personal predictors of functioning in affective disorders: Exploratory results from baseline and 6-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

Keyphrases

• 6-month Follow-up 100%
• Affective Disorders 100%
• Affective Symptoms 20%
• Bipolar Disorder 20%
• Childhood Trauma 100%
• Childhood Trauma Questionnaire 20%
• Clinical Factors 60%
• Clinical Predictors 100%
• Clinician Rating 20%
• Comprehensive Knowledge 20%
• Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations 20%
• Coping Strategies 20%
• Depression Severity 40%
• Depressive Symptoms 20%
• Emotion-focused Coping 40%
• Eysenck Personality Questionnaire 20%
• Functional Impairment 40%
• Functional Improvement 20%
• Functioning Assessment 20%
• Functioning Assessment Short Test 60%
• High-functioning 20%
• Long-term Functional Outcome 20%
• Maladaptive Coping 20%
• Motor Skills 60%
• Multiple Linear Regression Model 40%
• Negative Impact 20%
• Pearson Correlation 20%
• Performance-based 20%
• Personal Factors 80%
• Personal Predictors 100%
• Personality Traits 40%
• Process Skills 60%
• Randomized Controlled Trial 100%
• Significant Predictors 20%
• Symptom Factors 20%
• Trait Neuroticism 20%
• Unipolar Depressive Disorder 20%

Psychology

• Bipolar Disorder 25%
• Coping Strategies 50%
• Depression 75%
• Eysenck 25%
• Functional Impairment 50%
• Linear Regression Model 50%
• Mood Disorder 100%
• Multiple Linear Regression 50%
• Neuroticism 25%
• Personality Inventory 25%
• Personality Trait 50%

Neuroscience

• Bipolar Disorder 16%
• Depression 50%
• Emotional Disorder 16%
• Mood Disorder 100%
• Neuroticism 16%
• Pediatric Trauma 100%
• Personality Test 16%
• Personality Traits 33%
• Randomized Controlled Trial 100%