TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical and echocardiographic risk factors for device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure
T2 - an analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry
AU - Vij, Vivian
AU - Piayda, Kerstin
AU - Nelles, Dominik
AU - Gloekler, Steffen
AU - Galea, Roberto
AU - Fürholz, Monika
AU - Meier, Bernhard
AU - Valgimigli, Marco
AU - O'Hara, Gilles
AU - Arzamendi, Dabit
AU - Agudelo, Victor
AU - Asmarats, Lluis
AU - Freixa, Xavier
AU - Flores-Umanzor, Eduardo
AU - De Backer, Ole
AU - Søndergaard, Lars
AU - Nombela-Franco, Luis
AU - McInerney, Angela
AU - Korsholm, Kasper
AU - Nielsen-Kudsk, Jens Erik
AU - Afzal, Shazia
AU - Zeus, Tobias
AU - Operhalski, Felix
AU - Schmidt, Boris
AU - Montalescot, Gilles
AU - Guedeney, Paul
AU - Iriart, Xavier
AU - Miton, Noelie
AU - Saw, Jacqueline
AU - Gilhofer, Thomas
AU - Fauchier, Laurent
AU - Veliqi, Egzon
AU - Meincke, Felix
AU - Petri, Nils
AU - Nordbeck, Peter
AU - Ognerubov, Dmitrii
AU - Merkulov, Evgeny
AU - Cruz-González, Ignacio
AU - Gonzalez-Ferreiro, Rocio
AU - Bhatt, Deepak L
AU - Laricchia, Alessandra
AU - Mangieri, Antonio
AU - Omran, Heyder
AU - Schrickel, Jan Wilko
AU - Rodes-Cabau, Josep
AU - Sievert, Horst
AU - Nickenig, Georg
AU - Sedaghat, Alexander
N1 - © 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - BACKGROUND: Data on Device-related Thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate risk factors for DRT from centers reporting to the EUROC-DRT registry.METHODS: We included 537 patients (112 with DRT and 425 without DRT) who had undergone LAAC between 12/2008 and 04/2019. Baseline and implantation characteristics, anti-thrombotic treatment and clinical outcomes were compared between both groups in uni- and multivariate analyses. Additional propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to focus on the role of implantation characteristics.RESULTS: Patients with DRT showed higher rates of previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (49.1% vs. 34.7%, p < 0.01), spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) (44.9% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.01) and lower left atrial appendage (LAA) peak emptying velocity (35.4 ± 18.5 vs. 42.4 ± 18.0 cm/s, p = 0.02). Occluders implanted in DRT patients were larger (25.5 ± 3.8 vs. 24.6 ± 3.5 mm, p = 0.03) and implanted deeper in the LAA (mean depth: 7.6 ± 4.7 vs. 5.7 ± 4.7 mm, p < 0.01). Coverage of the appendage ostium was achieved less often in DRT patients (69.5% vs. 81.5%, p < 0.01), while DRT patients were less frequently on oral anticoagulation (7.1% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified age, prior stroke/TIA and SEC as independent risk factors for DRT. After PSM, implantation depth was found to be predictive. Rates of stroke/TIA were higher in DRT patients (13.5% vs. 3.8%, Hazard Ratio: 4.21 [95%-confidence interval: 1.88-9.49], p < 0.01).CONCLUSIONS: DRT after LAAC is associated with adverse outcome and appears to be of multifactorial origin, depending on patient characteristics, anticoagulation regimen and device position.
AB - BACKGROUND: Data on Device-related Thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate risk factors for DRT from centers reporting to the EUROC-DRT registry.METHODS: We included 537 patients (112 with DRT and 425 without DRT) who had undergone LAAC between 12/2008 and 04/2019. Baseline and implantation characteristics, anti-thrombotic treatment and clinical outcomes were compared between both groups in uni- and multivariate analyses. Additional propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to focus on the role of implantation characteristics.RESULTS: Patients with DRT showed higher rates of previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (49.1% vs. 34.7%, p < 0.01), spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) (44.9% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.01) and lower left atrial appendage (LAA) peak emptying velocity (35.4 ± 18.5 vs. 42.4 ± 18.0 cm/s, p = 0.02). Occluders implanted in DRT patients were larger (25.5 ± 3.8 vs. 24.6 ± 3.5 mm, p = 0.03) and implanted deeper in the LAA (mean depth: 7.6 ± 4.7 vs. 5.7 ± 4.7 mm, p < 0.01). Coverage of the appendage ostium was achieved less often in DRT patients (69.5% vs. 81.5%, p < 0.01), while DRT patients were less frequently on oral anticoagulation (7.1% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified age, prior stroke/TIA and SEC as independent risk factors for DRT. After PSM, implantation depth was found to be predictive. Rates of stroke/TIA were higher in DRT patients (13.5% vs. 3.8%, Hazard Ratio: 4.21 [95%-confidence interval: 1.88-9.49], p < 0.01).CONCLUSIONS: DRT after LAAC is associated with adverse outcome and appears to be of multifactorial origin, depending on patient characteristics, anticoagulation regimen and device position.
KW - Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
KW - Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging
KW - Atrial Fibrillation/complications
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Humans
KW - Ischemic Attack, Transient
KW - Registries
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Stroke/diagnosis
KW - Thrombosis/diagnosis
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Stroke
KW - Atrial fibrillation
KW - Left atrial appendage closure
KW - Device-related thrombus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134489269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00392-022-02065-4
DO - 10.1007/s00392-022-02065-4
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35849156
SN - 1861-0684
VL - 111
SP - 1276
EP - 1285
JO - Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
JF - Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
IS - 11
ER -