Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. An international consensus on the appropriate evaluation and treatment for adults with spinal deformity

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Significant differences in morbidity when comparing adverse events for cervical and lumbar spine surgery - prospectively graded with SAVES

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt i tidsskriftForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: Although the Roussouly classification of common variants in spinal sagittal alignment is well accepted, no studies have implemented it in an asymptomatic adult population. In addition, no study investigated the radiographic features of asymptomatic patients with an anteverted pelvis. The aim of this prospective radiographic study of 296 asymptomatic adults without spinal pathology was to investigate how the Roussouly classification could include the anteverted pelvis concept.

METHODS: Pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and the lumbar parameters lumbar lordosis (Global LL), lordosis tilt angle (LTA), total number of lordotic vertebra (LL verteb), and C7 plumbline/sacrofemoral distance ratio (C7PL ratio) were evaluated in 296 healthy volunteers (126 males, 170 females; mean age, 27 years; range 18-48 years). Comparison between the five types of the Roussouly classification used Student, ANOVA, and Tukey tests for quantitative variables and χ 2, Fischer, and Holm tests for qualitative variables.

RESULTS: Mean PI and PT were, respectively, (39°, 10°) for type 1, (41°, 10°) for type 2, (53°, 13°) for type 3, and (62°, 12°) for type 4 (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01). A sizable portion (16%) of the population (type 3 AP) showed low-grade PI (mean, 48° ± 6°) despite having SS > 35°. PT was low or negative (mean 4° ± 3°). C7PL ratio was >1 (in front of the hip axis) in 13% of all cases, and between 0 and 1 (between sacrum and hip axis) in 49%.

CONCLUSION: Although asymptomatic adults stood with stable global balance, the sagittal spinal alignment of healthy subjects, newly divided in 5 sagittal types, varied significantly. Type 3 AP appears as a new and unusual sagittal shape with low-grade PI, very low or negative PT, and hyperlordosis. Whereas most asymptomatic adults stood with C7PL behind the hip axis, a sizeable portion had C7 in front of the hip axis. This could be a new controversial aspect of ideal spinal balance.

TidsskriftEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)2002-2011
Antal sider10
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2018

ID: 56467330