Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: Comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jeppe Lange; Anders Troelsen; Reimar W. Thomsen; Kjeld Søballe

doi:10.2147/CLEP.S29025

Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: Comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jeppe Lange, Anders Troelsen, Reimar W. Thomsen, Kjeld Søballe

Ortopædkirurgisk Afdeling AHH

153 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Two-stage revision is regarded by many as the best treatment of chronic infection in hip arthroplasties. Some international reports, however, have advocated one-stage revision. No systematic review or meta-analysis has ever compared the risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revisions for chronic infection in hip arthroplasties.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Clinical Epidemiology
Vol/bind	4
Sider (fra-til)	57-73
Antal sider	17
ISSN	1179-1349
DOI	https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S29025
Status	Udgivet - 2012

Adgang til dokumentet

10.2147/CLEP.S29025

Citationsformater

@article{2a5a8161fda643b29f7161c17f831807,

title = "Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: Comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis",

abstract = "Two-stage revision is regarded by many as the best treatment of chronic infection in hip arthroplasties. Some international reports, however, have advocated one-stage revision. No systematic review or meta-analysis has ever compared the risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revisions for chronic infection in hip arthroplasties.",

author = "Jeppe Lange and Anders Troelsen and Thomsen, {Reimar W.} and Kjeld S{\o}balle",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.2147/CLEP.S29025",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "57--73",

journal = "Clinical Epidemiology",

issn = "1179-1349",

publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties

T2 - Comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Lange, Jeppe

AU - Troelsen, Anders

AU - Thomsen, Reimar W.

AU - Søballe, Kjeld

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Two-stage revision is regarded by many as the best treatment of chronic infection in hip arthroplasties. Some international reports, however, have advocated one-stage revision. No systematic review or meta-analysis has ever compared the risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revisions for chronic infection in hip arthroplasties.

AB - Two-stage revision is regarded by many as the best treatment of chronic infection in hip arthroplasties. Some international reports, however, have advocated one-stage revision. No systematic review or meta-analysis has ever compared the risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revisions for chronic infection in hip arthroplasties.

U2 - 10.2147/CLEP.S29025

DO - 10.2147/CLEP.S29025

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22500127

SN - 1179-1349

VL - 4

SP - 57

EP - 73

JO - Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Clinical Epidemiology

ER -

Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: Comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater