TY - JOUR
T1 - Choice of Bearings Influences the Implant Survival of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Osteoarthritis Aged 55 Years or Older
T2 - Results of 158,044 Patients from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association from 2005 to 2017
AU - Pakarinen, Oskari
AU - Ponkilainen, Ville
AU - Varnum, Claus
AU - Pedersen, Alma B
AU - Overgaard, Søren
AU - Kärrholm, Johan
AU - Rolfson, Ola
AU - Fenstad, Anne Marie
AU - Furnes, Ove
AU - Hallan, Geir
AU - Mäkelä, Keijo
AU - Eskelinen, Antti
N1 - Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to compare implant survival rates of different total hip arthroplasty (THA) bearings in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.METHODS: All conventional primary THAs performed between 2005 and 2017 in patients aged more than 55 years who had primary osteoarthritis were studied. Metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (MoXLP), ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (CoXLP), ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), and metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings were included. The outcome was a revision. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates were calculated at 5 and 10 years. The risk for revision was analyzed using a flexible parametric survival model adjusted for nation, age, sex, femoral head size, and femoral fixation.RESULTS: A total of 158,044 THAs were included. The 5-year KM estimates were 95.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 95.8 to 96.1) in MoXLP, 95.8% (95% CI 95.6 to 96.1) in CoXLP, 96.7% (95% CI 96.4 to 97.0) in CoC, and 93.9% (95% CI 93.5 to 94.4) in MoM. The 10-years KM estimates were 94.2% (94.0 to 94.5) in MoXLP, 94.3% (93.9 to 94.8) in CoXLP, 95.4% (95.0 to 95.9) in CoC, and 85.5% (84.9 to 86.2) in MoM. Compared with MoXLP, the adjusted risk for revision was lower in CoC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.6, CI 0.5 to 0.6), similar in CoXLP (HR 1.0, CI 0.9 to 1.0), and higher in MoM (HR 1.3, CI 1.2 to 1.4).CONCLUSIONS: We found that MoXLP, CoXLP, and CoC bearings evinced comparably high implant survival rates up to 10 years, and they can all be regarded as safe options in this patient group. The MoM bearings were associated with clearly lower survivorship. The CoC bearings had the highest implant survival and a lower adjusted risk for revision compared with highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings.
AB - BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to compare implant survival rates of different total hip arthroplasty (THA) bearings in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.METHODS: All conventional primary THAs performed between 2005 and 2017 in patients aged more than 55 years who had primary osteoarthritis were studied. Metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (MoXLP), ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (CoXLP), ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), and metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings were included. The outcome was a revision. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates were calculated at 5 and 10 years. The risk for revision was analyzed using a flexible parametric survival model adjusted for nation, age, sex, femoral head size, and femoral fixation.RESULTS: A total of 158,044 THAs were included. The 5-year KM estimates were 95.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 95.8 to 96.1) in MoXLP, 95.8% (95% CI 95.6 to 96.1) in CoXLP, 96.7% (95% CI 96.4 to 97.0) in CoC, and 93.9% (95% CI 93.5 to 94.4) in MoM. The 10-years KM estimates were 94.2% (94.0 to 94.5) in MoXLP, 94.3% (93.9 to 94.8) in CoXLP, 95.4% (95.0 to 95.9) in CoC, and 85.5% (84.9 to 86.2) in MoM. Compared with MoXLP, the adjusted risk for revision was lower in CoC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.6, CI 0.5 to 0.6), similar in CoXLP (HR 1.0, CI 0.9 to 1.0), and higher in MoM (HR 1.3, CI 1.2 to 1.4).CONCLUSIONS: We found that MoXLP, CoXLP, and CoC bearings evinced comparably high implant survival rates up to 10 years, and they can all be regarded as safe options in this patient group. The MoM bearings were associated with clearly lower survivorship. The CoC bearings had the highest implant survival and a lower adjusted risk for revision compared with highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings.
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation
KW - Ceramics
KW - Female
KW - Hip Prosthesis
KW - Humans
KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate
KW - Male
KW - Metal-on-Metal Joint Prostheses
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery
KW - Polyethylene
KW - Prosthesis Design
KW - Prosthesis Failure
KW - Registries
KW - Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
KW - bearing
KW - survival
KW - revision
KW - total hip arthroplasty
KW - register study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203997023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.015
DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.015
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39173975
SN - 0883-5403
VL - 40
SP - 437-442.e2
JO - The Journal of arthroplasty
JF - The Journal of arthroplasty
IS - 2
ER -