Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Cervical Spine Clearance in Trauma Patients with an Unreliable Physical Examination

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Definitions for Loss of Domain: An International Delphi Consensus of Expert Surgeons

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism Following Major Emergency Abdominal Surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Hyperoxia and Antioxidants for Myocardial Injury in Noncardiac Surgery: A 2 × 2 Factorial, Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Supplemental Oxygen for Traumatic Brain Injury - A Systematic Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. A high fraction of inspired oxygen may increase mortality in intubated trauma patients - A retrospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Biomarkers of Cerebral Injury for Prediction of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe and compare the timing of cervical spine clearance in trauma patients with an unreliable physical examination.

METHODS: We prospectively included adult trauma patients admitted with a cervical collar and an unreliable clinical examination (as defined by the NEXUS criteria) at two level 1 trauma centers: one in the USA (US) and one in Denmark (DK). We excluded patients with cervical spine injuries requiring a collar or surgery as treatment and patients with a collar placed after hospital arrival. The primary outcome was time from emergency department (ED) arrival to collar removal. Secondary outcomes included time to CT of the cervical spine (CTCS). At the US trauma center, an institutional protocol allowing cervical spine clearance exclusively by CTCS was in place. At the Danish trauma center, cervical spine clearance was based on a clinical evaluation by an orthopedic surgeon, usually after CTCS.

RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were included (US: n = 56; DK: n = 57). The median age was 47 years, and 68% were males. The main reasons for an unreliable physical examination were a Glasgow Coma Scale score below 14 (35%), distracting injuries (26%), cervical spine tenderness (13%) and intoxication (13%). The injury severity score at the US trauma center was higher than at the DK trauma center (median: 17 vs. 11, p = 0.03). Both time to CTCS (median: 41 vs. 18 min, p < 0.0001) and time to collar removal (median: 1042 vs. 49 min, p < 0.0001) were significantly greater at the US trauma center.

CONCLUSIONS: Time to collar removal was significantly greater in a trauma center utilizing a cervical spine clearance protocol based on CTCS. As patients may develop complications related to the collar, future studies should clarify how early removal can be implemented without increasing the risk of morbidity.

TidsskriftWorld Journal of Surgery
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1113-1120
Antal sider8
StatusUdgivet - 1 apr. 2020

ID: 58541562