Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Cervical screening in Denmark - a success followed by stagnation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Meet the Acta Oncologica editorial board

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Incidence and survival of hypopharyngeal cancer: a Danish Nation-Wide Study from 1980 to 2014

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. NTCP model validation method for DAHANCA patient selection of protons versus photons in head and neck cancer radiotherapy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Bacteremia and urogenital infection with Actinomyces urogenitalis following prolonged urinary retention

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. HPV-prevalence in elderly women in Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Conization and healthcare use: a population-based register study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Driving following defibrillator implantation: development and pilot results from a nationwide questionnaire

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in human papillomavirus self-sampling of screening non-attenders

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Elsebeth Lynge
  • Berit Andersen
  • Jette Christensen
  • Dorthe Ejersbo
  • Kirsten Marie Jochumsen
  • Tonje Johansen
  • Jette Kolding Kristensen
  • Lise Grupe Larsen
  • Frank Mehnert
  • Ellen Margrethe Mikkelsen
  • Karsten Nielsen
  • Carsten Rygaard
  • Reza Serizawa
  • Marianne Waldstrøm
Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: Despite an intensive screening activity, the incidence of cervical cancer in Denmark has remained stable for the last 15 years, while regional differences have increased. To search for explanations, we investigated possible weaknesses in the screening program.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on the screen-targeted women were retrieved from Statistics Denmark. Data on screening activity were retrieved from the annual reports from 2009 to 2015 on quality of cervical screening. Coverage was calculated as proportion of screen-targeted women with at least one cytology sample within recommended time intervals. Insufficient follow-up was calculated as proportion of abnormal and unsatisfactory samples not followed up within recommended time intervals. Diagnostic distribution was calculated for samples with a satisfactory cytology diagnosis.

RESULTS: Coverage remained stable at 75%-76% during the study period. Annually, approximately 100,000 women are screened before they are eligible for invitation, and 600,000 invitations and reminders are issued resulting in screening of 200,000 women. In 2009, 21% of abnormal and unsatisfactory samples were not followed up within the recommended time interval; a proportion that had decreased to 15% in 2015. Overall, 11% of satisfactory samples with a cytology diagnosis were abnormal, but with surprising variation from 6% to 15% across regions.

DISCUSSION: The success of a screening program depends first of all on coverage and timely follow-up of abnormal findings. Our analysis indicated that the currently high incidence of cervical cancer in Denmark may partly be due to low screening coverage. Also worrisome is a high proportion of non-timely follow-up of abnormal findings. Innovative ways to improve coverage and follow-up are urgently needed.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
Vol/bind57
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)354-361
ISSN0284-186X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 feb. 2018

ID: 51564513