TY - JOUR
T1 - Case report of LVEF derived from gated FDG-PET
T2 - potential to streamline cardiotoxic surveillance in melanoma patients
AU - Nielsen, Marc Østergaard
AU - Larsson, Johan Erik
AU - Duchstein, Linus Daniel Leonhard
AU - Jensen, Lars Thorbjørn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Advances in cancer therapy have improved patient outcomes, but cardiotoxicity remains a significant risk. In melanoma patients treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, monitoring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during treatment is recommended to detect cardiac dysfunction. Despite the widespread use of FDG-PET in oncology, its potential for concurrent cardiac assessment remains underexplored. Methods: A 42-year-old male undergoing treatment for disseminated melanoma underwent measurements of LVEF using four modalities: 3D-MUGA, 3D echocardiography, Rb-PET, and gated FDG-PET. Results: LVEF was within the normal range across all modalities: 60% (3D-MUGA), 61% (3D echocardiography), 63% (Rb-PET), and 65% (FDG-PET). Conclusion: This case presents an estimation of LVEF derived from a clinically indicated, FDG-PET scan, performed alongside three conventional modalities on the same day. This approach may be particularly useful in melanoma patients who undergo frequent FDG-PET scans. While the findings are promising, broader validation is needed.
AB - Background: Advances in cancer therapy have improved patient outcomes, but cardiotoxicity remains a significant risk. In melanoma patients treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, monitoring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during treatment is recommended to detect cardiac dysfunction. Despite the widespread use of FDG-PET in oncology, its potential for concurrent cardiac assessment remains underexplored. Methods: A 42-year-old male undergoing treatment for disseminated melanoma underwent measurements of LVEF using four modalities: 3D-MUGA, 3D echocardiography, Rb-PET, and gated FDG-PET. Results: LVEF was within the normal range across all modalities: 60% (3D-MUGA), 61% (3D echocardiography), 63% (Rb-PET), and 65% (FDG-PET). Conclusion: This case presents an estimation of LVEF derived from a clinically indicated, FDG-PET scan, performed alongside three conventional modalities on the same day. This approach may be particularly useful in melanoma patients who undergo frequent FDG-PET scans. While the findings are promising, broader validation is needed.
KW - Cardiotoxicity
KW - Gated FDG-PET
KW - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
KW - Melanoma
KW - Oncology Imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105006931453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/20450885.2025.2510194
DO - 10.1080/20450885.2025.2510194
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40435505
AN - SCOPUS:105006931453
SN - 2045-0885
VL - 12
JO - Melanoma Management
JF - Melanoma Management
IS - 1
M1 - 2510194
ER -