Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Caring for non-sedated mechanically ventilated patients in ICU: A qualitative study comparing perspectives of expert and competent nurses

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Delirium prevalence and prevention in patients with acute brain injury: A prospective before-and-after intervention study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. An ICU diary written by relatives: Who is it really written for? Response: Who is it really written for?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  3. Trends and recommendations for critical care nursing research in the Nordic countries: Triangulation of review and survey data

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Patients' perceptions of an intensive care unit diary written by relatives: A hermeneutic phenomenological study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Risk factors for long-term cognitive impairment in ICU survivors: A multicenter, prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Sleep and agitation during subacute traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A scoping review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Danish general practitioners' management of patients with COPD: a nationwide survey

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Cognitive function and health-related quality of life 1 year after acute brain injury: An observational study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Sedation practice has evolved from deep to lighter or no sedation in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). The care of conscious intubated patients constitutes a change in the nurse-patient interaction.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the perspectives of expert and competent nurses regarding their interaction with non-sedated mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

METHOD: The study had a qualitative comparative design applying semi-structured dyadic interviews. We interviewed five pairs of expert and competent ICU nurses with respectively >8 and 2-3 years of ICU experience and performed qualitative content analysis to explore the two perspectives.

FINDINGS: We identified four main categories illustrating complexities of nurse-patient interaction: Managing frustration, Attempting dialogue, Negotiating reality and Alleviating discomfort. Expert nurses expressed more frustration and ambivalence towards light sedation than competent nurses, who took awake patients for granted. All nurses experienced communication issues, demanding patients, and inability to provide adequate patient comfort.

CONCLUSION: Our study added to the knowledge of nurse-patient interaction by describing issues of frustration, ambivalence and insecurity in a contemporary context of minimal sedation. Expert nurses were mere concerned by awake patients than competent nurses. Lighter sedation in ICU requires better staffing and improved communication tools.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftIntensive and Critical Care Nursing
Vol/bind52
Sider (fra-til)35-41
Antal sider7
ISSN0964-3397
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

ID: 58616306