TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiopulmonary function in special operations forces compared to conventional infantry soldiers
AU - Rasmussen, Rasmus Syberg
AU - Jensen, Jakob Solgaard
AU - Rasmussen, Iben Elmerdahl
AU - Hartmann, Jacob Peter
AU - Egeberg, Clara Sofie
AU - Lytzen, Anna Agnes
AU - Nielsen, Klara
AU - Adamsen, Malte Lund
AU - Fischer, Mads
AU - Berg, Ronan M.G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Fitness is essential to military personnel in general, especially in the special operations forces (SOF), where the demanding tasks require a high level of physical fitness and mental robustness. However, little research has been done on SOF to characterise the putative underlying cardiopulmonary adaptations that distinguish them from conventional infantry soldiers (INF). This study aims to evaluate the cardiopulmonary function in SOF compared INF. The study assessed cardiac function and dimension using transthoracic echocardiography obtained at rest in eight soldiers from a SOF unit and in eight INF. (Formula presented.) was measured by direct calorimetry (secondary outcome) at the same time blood samples were collected to measure lactate levels. Lung function was assessed by spirometry, while the haemoglobin-corrected pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL,COc) was examined by the single-breath technique. SOF had higher stroke volume (mean difference = 21 mL, P < 0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference = 7%, P = 0.026) than INF. Furthermore, SOF had higher global constructive myocardial work and global work index compared to INF. (Formula presented.) as percentage of predicted according to age, weight and sex was higher in SOF, and they also had lower lactate levels during the (Formula presented.) test than INF (P = 0.029). None of the measured lung function metrics differed between groups. In conclusion, when compared to conventional infantry soldiers, SOF soldiers had marked cardiac adaptations with evidence of eccentric LV remodelling. It remains to be determined if this reflects different training regimes or selection.
AB - Fitness is essential to military personnel in general, especially in the special operations forces (SOF), where the demanding tasks require a high level of physical fitness and mental robustness. However, little research has been done on SOF to characterise the putative underlying cardiopulmonary adaptations that distinguish them from conventional infantry soldiers (INF). This study aims to evaluate the cardiopulmonary function in SOF compared INF. The study assessed cardiac function and dimension using transthoracic echocardiography obtained at rest in eight soldiers from a SOF unit and in eight INF. (Formula presented.) was measured by direct calorimetry (secondary outcome) at the same time blood samples were collected to measure lactate levels. Lung function was assessed by spirometry, while the haemoglobin-corrected pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL,COc) was examined by the single-breath technique. SOF had higher stroke volume (mean difference = 21 mL, P < 0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference = 7%, P = 0.026) than INF. Furthermore, SOF had higher global constructive myocardial work and global work index compared to INF. (Formula presented.) as percentage of predicted according to age, weight and sex was higher in SOF, and they also had lower lactate levels during the (Formula presented.) test than INF (P = 0.029). None of the measured lung function metrics differed between groups. In conclusion, when compared to conventional infantry soldiers, SOF soldiers had marked cardiac adaptations with evidence of eccentric LV remodelling. It remains to be determined if this reflects different training regimes or selection.
KW - echocardiography
KW - lung function
KW - maximal oxygen uptake
KW - military medicine
KW - training adaptations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105022892227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1113/EP092993
DO - 10.1113/EP092993
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41292142
AN - SCOPUS:105022892227
SN - 0958-0670
JO - Experimental Physiology
JF - Experimental Physiology
ER -