TY - JOUR
T1 - Cancer should not contravene the revascularization of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia
AU - Jessen, Majken L
AU - Eiberg, Jonas
AU - Sillesen, Henrik
AU - Lawaetz, Martin
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the frequency of cancer among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) due to peripheral artery disease (PAD) and to determine how active cancer affected outcomes after open or endovascular revascularization. In addition, we aimed to investigate all-cause mortality and cause of death in the PAD population.DESIGN: Observational single-centre cohort study based on a retrospective analysis of prospectively entered registry data.MATERIALS: All consecutive patients treated for CLTI due to PAD at a single university centre between the 1st of January 2011 and the 31st of December 2015 were included. Data from the Danish Vascular Registry (Karbase) regarding demographics, surgical procedure, and complications were linked with data from the Danish Cancer Registry and Cause of Death Registry.METHODS: The primary endpoint was major amputation-free survival. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications within 30 days, cancer-free survival, all-cause mortality and cause of death in the cohort. Major amputation-free survival, cancer-free survival and mortality were described with Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimates.RESULTS: We included 920 patients, of which 116 (13%) were in the active cancer group at the time of revascularization. There was no difference in amputation-free survival between those with cancer (86.8% 1-year KM estimate) and those without cancer (85.2% 1-year KM estimate) (p = 0.50). Likewise, we found no difference in 30-day postoperative complication rate. The risk of developing cancer in the included CLTI cohort was similar to the age-matched background population (6.1% vs 6.4%) (p = 0.69). All-cause mortality was higher in CLTI patients with cancer, mainly due to cancer, compared with CLTI patients without cancer who mainly died from cardiovascular disease. Three-year KM survival estimates were 48.3% (95% CI 40.0%-58.3%) and 64.4% (95% CI 61.2%-67.8%) (p = 0.014) for cancer and non-cancer patients, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Although cancer in patients with CLTI is related to higher medium- to long-term mortality, active cancer per se should not contravene revascularization, as postoperative complications and risk of amputation are not overrepresented.
AB - OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the frequency of cancer among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) due to peripheral artery disease (PAD) and to determine how active cancer affected outcomes after open or endovascular revascularization. In addition, we aimed to investigate all-cause mortality and cause of death in the PAD population.DESIGN: Observational single-centre cohort study based on a retrospective analysis of prospectively entered registry data.MATERIALS: All consecutive patients treated for CLTI due to PAD at a single university centre between the 1st of January 2011 and the 31st of December 2015 were included. Data from the Danish Vascular Registry (Karbase) regarding demographics, surgical procedure, and complications were linked with data from the Danish Cancer Registry and Cause of Death Registry.METHODS: The primary endpoint was major amputation-free survival. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications within 30 days, cancer-free survival, all-cause mortality and cause of death in the cohort. Major amputation-free survival, cancer-free survival and mortality were described with Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimates.RESULTS: We included 920 patients, of which 116 (13%) were in the active cancer group at the time of revascularization. There was no difference in amputation-free survival between those with cancer (86.8% 1-year KM estimate) and those without cancer (85.2% 1-year KM estimate) (p = 0.50). Likewise, we found no difference in 30-day postoperative complication rate. The risk of developing cancer in the included CLTI cohort was similar to the age-matched background population (6.1% vs 6.4%) (p = 0.69). All-cause mortality was higher in CLTI patients with cancer, mainly due to cancer, compared with CLTI patients without cancer who mainly died from cardiovascular disease. Three-year KM survival estimates were 48.3% (95% CI 40.0%-58.3%) and 64.4% (95% CI 61.2%-67.8%) (p = 0.014) for cancer and non-cancer patients, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Although cancer in patients with CLTI is related to higher medium- to long-term mortality, active cancer per se should not contravene revascularization, as postoperative complications and risk of amputation are not overrepresented.
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Female
KW - Aged
KW - Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Amputation, Surgical
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Neoplasms/mortality
KW - Time Factors
KW - Registries
KW - Limb Salvage
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
KW - Denmark/epidemiology
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Risk Assessment
KW - Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia/surgery
KW - Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Cause of Death
KW - Progression-Free Survival
KW - Clinical Decision-Making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140613171&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/17085381221135657
DO - 10.1177/17085381221135657
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36274575
SN - 1708-5381
VL - 32
SP - 330
EP - 336
JO - Vascular
JF - Vascular
IS - 2
ER -