Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Can inequality be tamed through boundary work? A qualitative study of health promotion aimed at reducing health inequalities

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Demanding devices - living with diabetes devices as a pre-teen

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Biographical disruption or cohesion? How parents deal with their child's autism diagnosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Managing type 1 diabetes in the context of work life: A matter of containment

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Vi skal strides noget mere for at finde de gode løsninger

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftBidrag til avis - Kommentar/debatFormidling

  2. Ulighed er noget, vi skaber

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftBidrag til avis - Kommentar/debatFormidling

  3. 'Standing together - at a distance': Documenting changes in mental-health indicators in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Towards a syndemic public health response to COVID-19

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  5. Ændrede rammer for hverdagslivet kan fremme sundheden og forebygge sygdom

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskning

Vis graf over relationer

This paper examines the organisational dynamics that arise in health promotion aimed at reducing health inequalities. The paper draws on ethnographic fieldwork among public health officers in Danish municipalities and qualitative interviews from an evaluation of health promotion programmes targeting homeless and other marginalised citizens. Analytically, we focus on ‘boundary work’, i.e. the ways in which social and symbolic boundaries are established, maintained, transgressed and negotiated, both at the administrative level and among frontline professionals. The paper discusses three types of boundary work: (i) demarcating professional domains; (ii) setting the boundaries of the task itself; and (iii) managing administrative boundaries. The main argument is that the production, maintenance and transgression of these three types of boundaries constitute central and time-consuming aspects of the practices of public health professionals, and that boundary work constitutes an important element in professional practices seeking to ‘tame a wicked problem’, such as social inequalities in health. A cross-cutting feature of the three types of boundary work is the management of the divide between health and social issues, which the professionals seemingly seek to uphold and transgress at the same time. The paper thus contributes to ongoing discussions of intersectoral action to address health inequalities. Furthermore, it extends the scope and application of the concept of boundary work in the sociology of public health by suggesting that the focus in previous research on professional demarcation be broadened in order to capture other types of boundaries that shape, and are shaped by, professional practices.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSocial Science and Medicine
Vol/bind185
Sider (fra-til)1-8
Antal sider8
ISSN0277-9536
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 jul. 2017
Eksternt udgivetJa

ID: 57247807