Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Business as (un)usual: A qualitative study of clerkship experiences during a health crisis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

DOI

  1. Does group size matter during collaborative skills learning? A randomised study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  2. Structural individualism or collaborative mindsets: Next steps for peer learning

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  3. Is two a crowd? A qualitative analysis of dyad learning in an OBGYN clinical clerkship

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  4. The gap in transfer research

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

  1. The concept of errors in medical education: a scoping review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewpeer review

  2. Subcutaneous Fat Necrosis of the Newborn

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: During a health crisis, hospitals must prioritise activities and resources, which can compromise clerkship-based learning. We explored how health crises affect clinical clerkships using the COVID-19 pandemic as an example.

METHODS: In a constructivist qualitative study, we conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (i.e. medical students and doctors) from two teaching hospitals and 10 different departments. We used thematic analysis to investigate our data and used stakeholder theory as a sensitising concept.

RESULTS: We identified three themes: (1) emotional triggers and reactions; (2) negotiation of legitimacy; and (3) building resilience. Our results suggest that the health crisis accentuated already existing problems in clerkships, such as students' feelings of low legitimacy, constant negotiation of roles, inconsistencies navigating rules and regulations and low levels of active participation. Medical students and doctors adapted to the new organisational demands by developing increased resilience. Students responded by reaching out for guidance and acceptance to remain relevant in the clinical clerkships. Doctors developed a behaviour of closing in and focused on managing themselves and their patients. This created tension between these two stakeholder groups.

CONCLUSION: A health crisis can critically disrupt the hierarchical structure within the clinical clerkships and exacerbate existing conflicts between stakeholder groups. When medical students are not perceived as legitimate stakeholders in clinical clerkships during a health crisis, their attendance is perceived as unnecessary or even a nuisance. Despite increased student proactiveness and resilience, their roles inevitably shift from being doctors-to-be to students-to-be-managed.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftMedical Education
Vol/bind56
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)805-814
Antal sider10
ISSN0308-0110
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2022

Bibliografisk note

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

ID: 74976623