Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine in patients with advanced-stage, classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a prespecified subgroup analysis of high-risk patients from the ECHELON-1 study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Reference values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma and in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Detailed Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Who Relapsed After the Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma Trials: MCL2 and MCL3

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Immune-related protein signature in serum stratify relapsed mantle cell lymphoma patients based on risk

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Martin Hutchings
  • John Radford
  • Stephen M Ansell
  • Árpád Illés
  • Anna Sureda
  • Joseph M Connors
  • Alice Sýkorová
  • Hirohiko Shibayama
  • Jeremy S Abramson
  • Neil S Chua
  • Jonathan W Friedberg
  • Jan Kořen
  • Ann Steward LaCasce
  • Lysiane Molina
  • Gerald Engley
  • Keenan Fenton
  • Hina Jolin
  • Rachael Liu
  • Ashish Gautam
  • Andrea Gallamini
Vis graf over relationer

Approximately one-third of patients diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma presenting with Stage IV disease do not survive past 5 years. We present updated efficacy and safety analyses in high-risk patient subgroups, defined by Stage IV disease or International Prognostic Score (IPS) of 4-7, enrolled in the ECHELON-1 study that compared brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A + AVD) versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) as first-line therapy after a median follow-up of 37.1 months. Among patients treated with A + AVD (n = 664) or ABVD (n = 670), 64% had Stage IV disease and 26% had an IPS of 4-7. Patients with Stage IV disease treated with A + AVD showed consistent improvements in PFS at 3 years as assessed by investigator (hazard ratio [HR], 0.723; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.537-0.973; p = 0.032). Similar improvements were seen in the subgroup of patients with IPS of 4-7 (HR, 0.588; 95% CI, 0.386-0.894; p = 0.012). The most common adverse events (AEs) in A + AVD-treated versus ABVD-treated patients with Stage IV disease were peripheral neuropathy (67% vs. 40%) and neutropenia (71% vs. 55%); in patients with IPS of 4-7, the most common AEs were peripheral neuropathy (69% vs. 45%), neutropenia (66% vs. 55%), and febrile neutropenia (23% vs. 9%), respectively. Patients in high-risk subgroups did not experience greater AE incidence or severity than patients in the total population. This updated analysis of ECHELON-1 shows a favorable benefit-risk balance in high-risk patients.

TidsskriftHematological Oncology
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)185-195
Antal sider11
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2021

ID: 62111497