Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Bowel Obstruction and Ventral Hernia After Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer in A Randomized Trial (COLOR II)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Comment on "Epidural Analgesia (TEA) vs. IV-PCA After Open Liver Surgery"

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  2. Robotic Surgery Is Less Physically Demanding Than Laparoscopic Surgery: Paired Cross Sectional Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Response to Comment on "Polypropylene Mesh and Fertility"

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  1. Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Incidence of Inguinal Hernia after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Kønsmodificerende kirurgi i Danmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Outcome Measures in Gender-Confirming Chest Surgery: A Systematic Scoping Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  • COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) II Study Group
Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of bowel obstruction, incisional, and parastomal hernia following laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been adopted worldwide, after trials reported similar oncological outcomes compared with open surgery. Little is known about long-term morbidity, including bowel obstruction, incisional, and parastomal hernia following surgery.

METHODS: Patients included in the international, multicenter, noninferior, open-label, randomized COLOR II trial were followed for five years. Primary endpoint was local recurrence at 3-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints included bowel obstruction, incisional and parastomal hernia within 5 years, and the current article reports on these secondary endpoints.

RESULTS: All 1044 patients included in the COLOR II trial were analyzed. There was no difference in risk of bowel obstruction, incisional, or parastomal hernia following laparoscopic or open surgery for rectal cancer.

CONCLUSION: Based on long-term morbidity outcomes, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer could be considered a routine technique as there are no differences with open surgery.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAnnals of Surgery
Vol/bind269
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)53-57
Antal sider5
ISSN0003-4932
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2019

ID: 57438805