Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Bowel Obstruction and Ventral Hernia After Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer in A Randomized Trial (COLOR II)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Response to Comment on "Polypropylene Mesh and Fertility"

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The S100A10 Pathway Mediates an Occult Hyperfibrinolytic Subtype in Trauma Patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Response to the Comment on "Should We Have a Little More Patience With the Conventional 2-Stage Hepatectomy?"

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  1. High-Throughput Sequencing-Based Investigation of Viruses in Human Cancers by Multienrichment Approach

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Adverse reactions of dimethyl sulfoxide in humans: a systematic review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. A national center for persistent severe pain after groin hernia repair: Five-year prospective data

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Response to Comment on "Polypropylene Mesh and Fertility"

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) II Study Group
Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of bowel obstruction, incisional, and parastomal hernia following laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been adopted worldwide, after trials reported similar oncological outcomes compared with open surgery. Little is known about long-term morbidity, including bowel obstruction, incisional, and parastomal hernia following surgery.

METHODS: Patients included in the international, multicenter, noninferior, open-label, randomized COLOR II trial were followed for five years. Primary endpoint was local recurrence at 3-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints included bowel obstruction, incisional and parastomal hernia within 5 years, and the current article reports on these secondary endpoints.

RESULTS: All 1044 patients included in the COLOR II trial were analyzed. There was no difference in risk of bowel obstruction, incisional, or parastomal hernia following laparoscopic or open surgery for rectal cancer.

CONCLUSION: Based on long-term morbidity outcomes, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer could be considered a routine technique as there are no differences with open surgery.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAnnals of Surgery
Vol/bind269
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)53-57
Antal sider5
ISSN0003-4932
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2019

ID: 57438805