TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone histomorphometry for the diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy - a European consensus statement
AU - Lafage-Proust, Marie-Helene
AU - Jørgensen, Hanne Skou
AU - Bravenboer, Nathalie
AU - Ferreira, Anibal
AU - Bégin, Marie-Josée
AU - Cannata-Andia, Jorge
AU - Cejka, Daniel
AU - Chavassieux, Pascale
AU - Cohen-Solal, Martine
AU - D'Haese, Patrick
AU - Fahrleitner-Pammer, Astrid
AU - Ferreira, Ana Carina
AU - Fusaro, Maria
AU - Gerbaix, Maude
AU - Hamdy, Neveen
AU - Hansen, Ditte
AU - de Jongh, Renate
AU - Kröger, Heikki
AU - Lalayiannis, Alexander D
AU - Salam, Syazrah
AU - Spasovski, Goce
AU - Shroff, Rukshana
AU - Tong, XiaoYu
AU - Trombetti, Andrea
AU - Ureña, Pablo
AU - Bacchetta, Justine
AU - Mazzaferro, Sandro
AU - Haarhaus, Mathias
AU - Evenepoel, Pieter
AU - European Renal Osteodystrophy initiative of the CKD-MBD working group of the European Renal Association
N1 - Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Histomorphometric analysis of an iliac bone biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy (ROD), which comprises various histological lesions induced by chronic kidney disease (CKD). ROD belongs to the framework of CKD-associated osteoporosis. The use of bone biopsy in the routine management of CKD-associated osteoporosis has decreased over the past decades for various reasons, including diminishing expertise in performing the procedure, and major variability in processing bone samples and reporting of results. In this context, the European Renal Osteodystrophy group, a part of the CKD-mineral and bone disorder working group of the European Renal Association launched an initiative to evaluate various issues related to bone histomorphometry in the context of ROD. To this effect, 28 experts from 14 European countries engaged in rounds of discussions to reach a consensus related to the bone biopsy procedure, sample handling, and reading and reporting findings. Key conclusions include a recommendation that all practitioners in this field move towards reporting diagnostic findings by the turnover, mineralization, and volume (TMV) classification and that external quality control is prioritized to ensure validity and reproducibility of results. The consensus group recognises that the lack of an accepted normative reference for bone histomorphometry is a barrier towards uniform diagnostic definitions and recommends further collaborative efforts in this area. Until these issues are solved, transparent reporting on the choice of reference and diagnostic definitions applied should be adhered to, both in clinical reports and research settings.
AB - Histomorphometric analysis of an iliac bone biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy (ROD), which comprises various histological lesions induced by chronic kidney disease (CKD). ROD belongs to the framework of CKD-associated osteoporosis. The use of bone biopsy in the routine management of CKD-associated osteoporosis has decreased over the past decades for various reasons, including diminishing expertise in performing the procedure, and major variability in processing bone samples and reporting of results. In this context, the European Renal Osteodystrophy group, a part of the CKD-mineral and bone disorder working group of the European Renal Association launched an initiative to evaluate various issues related to bone histomorphometry in the context of ROD. To this effect, 28 experts from 14 European countries engaged in rounds of discussions to reach a consensus related to the bone biopsy procedure, sample handling, and reading and reporting findings. Key conclusions include a recommendation that all practitioners in this field move towards reporting diagnostic findings by the turnover, mineralization, and volume (TMV) classification and that external quality control is prioritized to ensure validity and reproducibility of results. The consensus group recognises that the lack of an accepted normative reference for bone histomorphometry is a barrier towards uniform diagnostic definitions and recommends further collaborative efforts in this area. Until these issues are solved, transparent reporting on the choice of reference and diagnostic definitions applied should be adhered to, both in clinical reports and research settings.
KW - Biopsy
KW - Bone and Bones/pathology
KW - Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder/diagnosis
KW - Consensus
KW - Europe
KW - Humans
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105007991903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bone.2025.117544
DO - 10.1016/j.bone.2025.117544
M3 - Review
C2 - 40446949
SN - 1873-2763
VL - 199
SP - 117544
JO - Bone
JF - Bone
M1 - 117544
ER -