TY - JOUR
T1 - Body composition analysis using bioelectric impedance in Bissau
T2 - reproducibility and level of agreement between two available devices
AU - Sanca, Lilica
AU - Byberg, Stine
AU - Có, Cipriano
AU - da Costa, Geovane
AU - Indami, Marceano
AU - Rama, Luis
AU - Teixeira, Ana Maria
AU - Bjerregaard-Andersen, Morten
AU - Carvalho, Eugénia
N1 - Copyright: Lilica Sanca et al.
PY - 2024/5/1
Y1 - 2024/5/1
N2 - INTRODUCTION: the need to correctly measure and follow body composition as a simple disease prevention metric is important, especially where the healthcare infrastructures are poor. The variety of inexpensive devices available for this purpose is large. However, it is imperative to validate them in relation to the gold standard method, dual-energy absorptiometry X-ray (DEXA). In low-income countries, DEXA measurements aren't available. Thus, easy-to-use, and accurate devices are indispensable. In Guinea-Bissau, two relatively inexpensive, bioelectrical impedance scales, simple to use, are available. However, their accuracy has not been assessed in this setting. The study compares the level of agreement in measurements between, the Tanita® BC-545 and the Omron Karada Scan BF511, in adult volunteers.METHODS: volunteers grouped for athletic and sports modalities at stadiums and sports facilities in Bissau were included. All anthropometric measurements were done in both devices. For statistical analysis, we created Bland-Altman plots to assess their level of agreement.RESULTS: the study included 274 participants, mean age 27.4 years, 214 (78%) males. For body fat, the median between the Omron and Tanita measures was 2.6 and the interquartile was 5.2. The Omron measured median body mass index, -0.3 kg/m2 and 0.8 kg/m2 of interquartile below that of the Tanita. For visceral fat, the Omron measured 1% of median and an interquartile of 2% above that of the Tanita. For skeletal muscle, the Omron median measured 11.3% and 11.4 % of interquartile below that of the Tanita. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for body fat (BF), body mass index (BMI) and skeletal muscle (SM) was 0.99 and for VF it was 1.00 on both devices.CONCLUSION: the results indicate a good level of agreement between the two devices. In resource-limited settings, the Omron is likely a reasonable substitute for more expensive body composition devices.
AB - INTRODUCTION: the need to correctly measure and follow body composition as a simple disease prevention metric is important, especially where the healthcare infrastructures are poor. The variety of inexpensive devices available for this purpose is large. However, it is imperative to validate them in relation to the gold standard method, dual-energy absorptiometry X-ray (DEXA). In low-income countries, DEXA measurements aren't available. Thus, easy-to-use, and accurate devices are indispensable. In Guinea-Bissau, two relatively inexpensive, bioelectrical impedance scales, simple to use, are available. However, their accuracy has not been assessed in this setting. The study compares the level of agreement in measurements between, the Tanita® BC-545 and the Omron Karada Scan BF511, in adult volunteers.METHODS: volunteers grouped for athletic and sports modalities at stadiums and sports facilities in Bissau were included. All anthropometric measurements were done in both devices. For statistical analysis, we created Bland-Altman plots to assess their level of agreement.RESULTS: the study included 274 participants, mean age 27.4 years, 214 (78%) males. For body fat, the median between the Omron and Tanita measures was 2.6 and the interquartile was 5.2. The Omron measured median body mass index, -0.3 kg/m2 and 0.8 kg/m2 of interquartile below that of the Tanita. For visceral fat, the Omron measured 1% of median and an interquartile of 2% above that of the Tanita. For skeletal muscle, the Omron median measured 11.3% and 11.4 % of interquartile below that of the Tanita. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for body fat (BF), body mass index (BMI) and skeletal muscle (SM) was 0.99 and for VF it was 1.00 on both devices.CONCLUSION: the results indicate a good level of agreement between the two devices. In resource-limited settings, the Omron is likely a reasonable substitute for more expensive body composition devices.
KW - Humans
KW - Electric Impedance
KW - Body Composition/physiology
KW - Male
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Guinea-Bissau
KW - Young Adult
KW - Anthropometry/methods
KW - Absorptiometry, Photon
KW - Adipose Tissue
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Adolescent
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Bioelectrical impedance
KW - body composition
KW - Tanita
KW - Omron
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206484891&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11604/pamj.2024.48.80.42997
DO - 10.11604/pamj.2024.48.80.42997
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39429551
SN - 1937-8688
VL - 48
SP - 80
JO - The Pan African medical journal
JF - The Pan African medical journal
M1 - 80
ER -