Abstract
The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) relies on clinical assessment, D-dimer test and diagnostic imaging. Modern CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and SPECT/CT are rather equal in terms of sensitivity, specificity and inconclusive results for the diagnosis of PE, outper-forming planar lung scintigraphy. Furthermore, SPECT/CT and CTPA can both provide important information regarding differential diagnoses. Thus, the choice of primary diag-nostic modality relies on local expertise, availability and special circumstances like radiation dose, contraindications and the clinical urgency.
| Bidragets oversatte titel | The choice of diagnostic modality for acute pulmonary embolism |
|---|---|
| Originalsprog | Dansk |
| Artikelnummer | V05170391 |
| Tidsskrift | Ugeskrift for Laeger |
| Vol/bind | 180 |
| Udgave nummer | 8 |
| ISSN | 0041-5782 |
| Status | Udgivet - 19 feb. 2018 |
| Udgivet eksternt | Ja |
Emneord
- Acute Disease
- Computed Tomography Angiography/adverse effects
- Contraindications, Procedure
- Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism
- Humans
- Pulmonary Embolism/blood
- Radiation Dosage
- Radionuclide Imaging/adverse effects
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography/adverse effects
- Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/adverse effects
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Billeddiagnostisk udredning ved mistanke om akut lungeemboli'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Citationsformater
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS