Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Barriers to, and Facilitators of, Exercising in Fitness Centres among Adults with and without Physical Disabilities: A Scoping Review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review


  1. Motivation, Barriers, and Suggestions for Intradialytic Exercise-A Qualitative Study among Patients and Nurses

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Facilitators and Barriers for Young Medical Doctors Writing Their First Manuscript for Publication

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Infographic. Benefits and harms of exercise therapy in people with multimorbidity

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  2. Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Joint hypermobility in athletes is associated with shoulder injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Fitness centres are an obvious arena for performing physical activity for the general population but representation of adults with physical disabilities (AwPD) is lacking. To increase possibilities for AwPD to exercise in fitness centres together with adults without physical disabilities (AwoPD), the aim of this study was to identify, synthesise, and compare barriers to, and facilitators of, exercising in fitness centres for each group. A scoping review was conducted and data extraction of the barriers and facilitators was performed independently by two researchers on six categories of contextual factors based on the framework of Di Blasi: (1) The fitness centre setting; (2) The fitness centre user characteristics; (3) The fitness instructor/staff characteristics; (4) The fitness centre user-instructor/management relationship; and (5) The fitness/exercise characteristics. An extra category, (6) Other relationships, was added. The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews was used for reporting. Of the 102 included papers, only 26 (25%) of the papers were on AwPD, which focused mainly on physical barriers (category 1: inaccessible settings). In contrast, the remaining 76 papers involving AwoPD focused primarily on facilitators (category 2: motivational factors and exercising effects). In categories 3-6, the two groups had similar results, as both groups preferred skilled instructors, a welcoming and comfortable fitness centre environment, an ability to exercise at their preferred type and level, and good social connections. Since most data were based on AwoPD, more studies on actual experiences from AwPD are needed, to reveal the facilitators/motivational factors for fitness centre use.

TidsskriftInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Udgave nummer14
StatusUdgivet - 9 jul. 2021

ID: 66933901