TY - JOUR
T1 - Balancing ideals and realities
T2 - health care professionals' perspectives of and attitudes toward digital patient-centered cancer care
AU - Lundereng, Elias David
AU - Brkic, Alen
AU - Absolom, Kate
AU - Andvik, Elisabeth
AU - Beernaert, Kim
AU - Cresswell, Kathrin
AU - Dajani, Olav Faisal
AU - De Glas, Nienke
AU - Fallon, Marie
AU - Freitas-Durks, Victoria
AU - Guldhav, Kristin Vassbotn
AU - Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen
AU - Kaasa, Stein
AU - Kurita, Geana Paula
AU - Lund, Jo Åsmund
AU - Mitrea, Nicoleta
AU - Damink, Steven Olde
AU - Paulsen, Ørnulf
AU - Pedersen, Guro Meldre
AU - Skåre, Terese Solvoll
AU - Lundeby, Tonje
AU - The MyPath consortium
A2 - Sjøgren, Per
A2 - Pappot, Helle
A2 - Mathiesen, Ulla Breitenstein
A2 - Lassen, Ulrik
A2 - Larsen, Henrik
A2 - Lykke, Camilla
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025. The Author(s).
PY - 2026/2/18
Y1 - 2026/2/18
N2 - PURPOSE: Patient-centered care (PCC) improves quality of life, symptom management and healthcare outcomes in oncology. However, integration into routine cancer care remains limited. Digital solutions using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) offer a potential mechanism to operationalize PCC. This study explored healthcare professionals' (HCPs) pre-implementation perspectives on using digital PROMs to support PCC in Norwegian oncology outpatient clinics, informing the design and implementation strategies of the European MyPath digital solution. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (n = 29) and three focus groups (n = 16) were conducted with varied HCPs across four Norwegian hospitals. Interviews explored perceptions of PCC, experiences with PROMs, and requirements for digital implementation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, combining inductive and deductive coding guided by the TPOM framework. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (1) balancing PCC with disease-centered practices, (2) integrating PCC into daily routines, (3) customization and patient acceptance of digital tools, and (4) combining patient-reported data with clinical autonomy. HCPs viewed digital PROMs as promising for facilitating PCC but emphasized that successful implementation requires workflow alignment, adaptable digital solutions, and strong stakeholder engagement. Concerns included patient digital literacy, workload implications, and overreliance on PROMs at the expense of direct patient interaction. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight a tension between HCPs' needs for technical functionality and workflow alignment, and the support required to adapt their practice to fully realize PCC through digital tools. Integrating PCC successfully requires organizational, cultural, and workflow adaptations, alongside active HCP engagement in design and implementation. These changes are essential to reposition PCC as an integral rather than competing component of high-quality cancer care.
AB - PURPOSE: Patient-centered care (PCC) improves quality of life, symptom management and healthcare outcomes in oncology. However, integration into routine cancer care remains limited. Digital solutions using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) offer a potential mechanism to operationalize PCC. This study explored healthcare professionals' (HCPs) pre-implementation perspectives on using digital PROMs to support PCC in Norwegian oncology outpatient clinics, informing the design and implementation strategies of the European MyPath digital solution. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (n = 29) and three focus groups (n = 16) were conducted with varied HCPs across four Norwegian hospitals. Interviews explored perceptions of PCC, experiences with PROMs, and requirements for digital implementation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, combining inductive and deductive coding guided by the TPOM framework. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (1) balancing PCC with disease-centered practices, (2) integrating PCC into daily routines, (3) customization and patient acceptance of digital tools, and (4) combining patient-reported data with clinical autonomy. HCPs viewed digital PROMs as promising for facilitating PCC but emphasized that successful implementation requires workflow alignment, adaptable digital solutions, and strong stakeholder engagement. Concerns included patient digital literacy, workload implications, and overreliance on PROMs at the expense of direct patient interaction. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight a tension between HCPs' needs for technical functionality and workflow alignment, and the support required to adapt their practice to fully realize PCC through digital tools. Integrating PCC successfully requires organizational, cultural, and workflow adaptations, alongside active HCP engagement in design and implementation. These changes are essential to reposition PCC as an integral rather than competing component of high-quality cancer care.
KW - Digital health
KW - Implementation science
KW - Oncology
KW - Patient-centered care
KW - PROMs
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Quality of life
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030535157
U2 - 10.1007/s11136-025-04103-w
DO - 10.1007/s11136-025-04103-w
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41709015
AN - SCOPUS:105030535157
SN - 0962-9343
VL - 35
SP - 76
JO - Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
JF - Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
IS - 3
ER -