Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Characterization of Lung Tumors that the Pulmonologist can Biopsy from the Esophagus with Endosonography (EUS-B-FNA)

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Aspiration of Pericardial Effusion Performed with EUS-B-FNA in Suspected Lung Cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Best Practice in Monitoring and Managing a Relentless Fibrotic Disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Quantitative fluorescence angiography detects dynamic changes in gastric perfusion

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The learning curve of robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery - A randomized trial in a simulated setting

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Motor skills have been identified as a useful measure to evaluate competency in bronchoscopy. However, no automatic assessment system of motor skills with a clear pass/fail criterion in flexible bronchoscopy exists.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to develop an objective and automatic measure of motor skills in bronchoscopy and set a pass/fail criterion.

METHODS: Participants conducted 3 bronchoscopies each in a simulated setting. They were equipped with a Myo Armband that measured lower arm movements through an inertial measurement unit, and hand and finger motions through electromyography sensors. These measures were composed into an objective and automatic composite score of motor skills, the motor bronchoscopy skills score (MoBSS).

RESULTS: Twelve novices, eleven intermediates, and ten expert bronchoscopy operators participated, resulting in 99 procedures available for assessment. MoBSS was correlated with a higher diagnostic completeness (Pearson's correlation, r = 0.43, p < 0.001) and a lower procedure time (Pearson's correlation, r = -0.90, p < 0.001). MoBSS was able to differentiate operator performance based on the experience level (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). Using the contrasting groups' method, a passing score of -0.08 MoBSS was defined that failed 30/36 (83%) novice, 5/33 (15%) intermediate, and 1/30 (3%) expert procedures.

CONCLUSIONS: MoBSS can be used as an automatic and unbiased assessment tool for motor skills performance in flexible bronchoscopy. MoBSS has the potential to generate automatic feedback to help guide trainees toward expert performance.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRespiration; international review of thoracic diseases
Vol/bind100
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)347-355
Antal sider9
ISSN0025-7931
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2021

Bibliografisk note

© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.

ID: 62067720