TY - JOUR
T1 - Associations of obesity phenotypes with weight change, cardiometabolic benefits, and type 2 diabetes incidence during a lifestyle intervention
T2 - results from the PREVIEW study
AU - Zhu, Ruixin
AU - Huttunen-Lenz, Maija
AU - Stratton, Gareth
AU - Handjieva-Darlenska, Teodora
AU - Handjiev, Svetoslav
AU - Sundvall, Jouko
AU - Silvestre, Marta P
AU - Jalo, Elli
AU - Pietiläinen, Kirsi H
AU - Adam, Tanja C
AU - Drummen, Mathijs
AU - Simpson, Elizabeth J
AU - Taylor, Moira A
AU - Poppitt, Sally D
AU - Navas-Carretero, Santiago
AU - Martinez, J Alfredo
AU - Schlicht, Wolfgang
AU - Fogelholm, Mikael
AU - Brand-Miller, Jennie
AU - Raben, Anne
N1 - © 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Background/Objectives: Some individuals with overweight/obesity may be relatively metabolically healthy (MHO) and have a lower risk of cardiovascular disease than those with metabolically unhealthy overweight/obesity (MUO). We aimed to compare changes in body weight and cardiometabolic risk factors and type 2 diabetes incidence during a lifestyle intervention between individuals with MHO vs MUO. Methods: This post-hoc analysis included 1012 participants with MHO and 1153 participants with MUO at baseline in the randomized trial PREVIEW. Participants underwent an eight-week low-energy diet phase followed by a 148-week lifestyle-based weight-maintenance intervention. Adjusted linear mixed models and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in weight loss (%) between participants with MHO vs MUO over 156 weeks. At the end of the study, weight loss was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.7%–3.6%) in participants with MHO and 3.0% (2.1%–4.0%) in those with MUO. After the low-energy diet phase, participants with MHO had smaller decreases in triglyceride (mean difference between MHO vs MUO 0.08 mmol·L
−1 [95% CI, 0.04–0.12]; P < 0.001) but similar reductions in fasting glucose and HOMA-IR than those with MUO. However, at the end of weight maintenance, those with MHO had greater reductions in triglyceride (mean difference −0.08 mmol·L
−1 [−0.12–−0.04]; P < 0.001), fasting glucose, 2-hour glucose (difference −0.28 mmol·L
−1 [−0.41–−0.16]; P < 0.001), and HOMA-IR than those with MUO. Participants with MHO had smaller decreases in diastolic blood pressure and HbA
1c and greater decreases in HDL cholesterol after weight loss than those with MUO, whereas the statistically significant differences disappeared at the end of weight maintenance. Participants with MHO had lower 3-year type 2 diabetes incidence than those with MUO (adjusted hazard ratio 0.37 [0.20–0.66]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Individuals with MUO had greater improvements in some cardiometabolic risk factors during the low-energy diet phase, but had smaller improvements during long-term lifestyle intervention than those with MHO.
AB - Background/Objectives: Some individuals with overweight/obesity may be relatively metabolically healthy (MHO) and have a lower risk of cardiovascular disease than those with metabolically unhealthy overweight/obesity (MUO). We aimed to compare changes in body weight and cardiometabolic risk factors and type 2 diabetes incidence during a lifestyle intervention between individuals with MHO vs MUO. Methods: This post-hoc analysis included 1012 participants with MHO and 1153 participants with MUO at baseline in the randomized trial PREVIEW. Participants underwent an eight-week low-energy diet phase followed by a 148-week lifestyle-based weight-maintenance intervention. Adjusted linear mixed models and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in weight loss (%) between participants with MHO vs MUO over 156 weeks. At the end of the study, weight loss was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.7%–3.6%) in participants with MHO and 3.0% (2.1%–4.0%) in those with MUO. After the low-energy diet phase, participants with MHO had smaller decreases in triglyceride (mean difference between MHO vs MUO 0.08 mmol·L
−1 [95% CI, 0.04–0.12]; P < 0.001) but similar reductions in fasting glucose and HOMA-IR than those with MUO. However, at the end of weight maintenance, those with MHO had greater reductions in triglyceride (mean difference −0.08 mmol·L
−1 [−0.12–−0.04]; P < 0.001), fasting glucose, 2-hour glucose (difference −0.28 mmol·L
−1 [−0.41–−0.16]; P < 0.001), and HOMA-IR than those with MUO. Participants with MHO had smaller decreases in diastolic blood pressure and HbA
1c and greater decreases in HDL cholesterol after weight loss than those with MUO, whereas the statistically significant differences disappeared at the end of weight maintenance. Participants with MHO had lower 3-year type 2 diabetes incidence than those with MUO (adjusted hazard ratio 0.37 [0.20–0.66]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Individuals with MUO had greater improvements in some cardiometabolic risk factors during the low-energy diet phase, but had smaller improvements during long-term lifestyle intervention than those with MHO.
KW - Body Mass Index
KW - Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology
KW - Glucose
KW - Humans
KW - Incidence
KW - Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology
KW - Obesity/complications
KW - Overweight
KW - Phenotype
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Triglycerides
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164155881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41366-023-01328-y
DO - 10.1038/s41366-023-01328-y
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37420008
SN - 0307-0565
VL - 47
SP - 833
EP - 840
JO - International journal of obesity (2005)
JF - International journal of obesity (2005)
IS - 9
ER -